标题: 大全90 另外一道比较 [打印本页] 作者: zhaoyiqing 时间: 2009-11-11 14:47 标题: 大全90 另外一道比较 90.Although Napoleon’s army entered Russia with far more supplies than they had in their previous campaigns, it had provisions for only twenty-four days. (A) they had in their previous campaigns (B) their previous campaigns had had (C) they had for any previous campaign (D) in their previous campaigns (E) for any previous campaign the key:E。作者: zhaoyiqing 时间: 2009-11-11 14:48
虽然用复数排除了 ABCD 但是E。。。。。。。作者: lorrain_cc 时间: 2009-11-11 14:57
a,b,c的had无法还原,因为比较前根本没有had, 我觉得是为了这场仗,准备了比以前任何一场战役都多的储备食物作者: payo 时间: 2009-11-11 15:26
E估计是省略了those (supplies) 如果是省略了it had had的话 那lz问的那道大全10的A就可以省略it was了 不确定 仍疑惑中作者: lorrain_cc 时间: 2009-11-11 15:34
我咋觉得像是比较前的省了状语~"for this campaign" 囧!作者: zhaoyiqing 时间: 2009-11-11 17:57
我觉得HAD可以啊 发生在过去的过去嘛作者: lorrain_cc 时间: 2009-11-11 18:07
那had后面的V接什么??? 前面只有一个enter,接enter不合逻辑吧作者: payo 时间: 2009-11-11 20:05
nvm作者: zhaoyiqing 时间: 2009-11-11 21:09
省略了ENTERED吧 我臆测
是有很多题比较前后不一致,但我觉得和这题没关- -作者: dontwannalose 时间: 2009-11-11 23:41
个人觉得最后一个选相对的原因是两个介词短语平行:with far more supplies & for any previous campaigns 短语的结构当然越相似越好,但如果没有绝对相似的话,只要是介词短语都可以平行的作者: zhaoyiqing 时间: 2009-11-12 12:49
让我想起了那到simultaneous with but independent of作者: yhwut 时间: 2009-11-13 05:34
此题出的极其阴险而且很巧妙,关键在于后面it had provisions for only twenty-four days ,这个是主句,因为前面那句是although开始的。 所以根据 比较状语从句 语法: 比较状语从句中,常将从句中与主句中的相同成分省略,而相同成分就是it had,所以补充完整就是: Although Napoleon’s army entered Russia with far more supplies than (it had )for any previous campaign, it had provisions for only twenty-four days.作者: zhaoyiqing 时间: 2009-11-13 11:38
楼上的 赞一个作者: guoshuyu 时间: 2012-1-25 23:48
不是it had,应该是it had had,要注意时态哦~