4.  olitician:
Fewer people are entering the labor market now than previously. If the economy
grows, the demand for motivated and educated people will far outstrip the
supply. Some companies have already started to respond to this labor-market
situation by finding better ways to keep their current employees. Their concern
is a sure indicator that the economy is growing.
Which of the following is the best
criticism of the politician’s reasoning?
(A) The fact
that companies are making prudent preparations for a possible future
development does not mean that this development is already taking place.
(B) The fact
that some companies now try harder to keep their employees does not mean that
they used to be indifferent to employee morale.
(C) The fact
that demand will outstrip supply does not mean that there will be no supply at
all.
(D) The fact
that the number of new entrants into the labor market is declining does not
mean that the number of new entrants is lower than it has ever been.(A)
(E) The fact that
current employees have become more valuable to some companies does not mean
that those employees will do their jobs better than they used to.4
the answer is A.其他选项均可排除。
思路
前提:劳动力供不应求的时候—>经济是发展的
结论:公司正为这种情况做准备—>所以经济是发展的
我这里的问题是have already started to respond to this labor-market
situation如何理解。因为公司“already started to respond to this labor-market situation”,所以此处的labor-market
situation是已经存在的,但是如果根据A的理解的话,公司只是在为可能到来的情况做准备。
那么如何解释公司respond的situation呢?
我唯一找到的解释是这里的situation讲的是Fewer people are entering the labor market now than previously。
请指教。
up!
整理原文的推理过程因为招不到好的员工),公司想办法留人,=>需求大于供应=>经济在发展.原文结论的推理过程好像是反向的.另外从结构上看:先提供推理的原理,再应用到事实,得出结论.
前提:economy grows——> demand上升
结论:Some companies finding better ways to keep their current employees——>
economy grows
(A) The fact that companies are making prudent有先见之明的 preparations for a possible future development does not mean that this development is already taking place.即逆命题不成立
就是这个解释,说的感觉跟LSAT有些像了,呵呵
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |