ChaseDream

标题: feifei 45 [打印本页]

作者: zoechou11 时间: 2009-10-20 17:43
标题: feifei 45

45. Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall of a billion dollars in the coming fiscal year. Since there is no feasible way to increase the available funds, our only choice is to decrease expenditures. The plan before you outlines feasible cuts that would yield savings of a billion dollars over the coming fiscal year. We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan.

This reasoning in the commissioner’s argument is flawed because this argument

(A) relies on information that is far from certain

(B) confuses being an adequate solution with being a required solution

(D) inappropriately employs language that is vague

(E) takes for granted that there is no way to increase available funds

为什么选B 呢？

我觉得逻辑好难，难过阅读和语法好多，怎么做才能提高？

谢谢大家了~

作者: sunjin1988 时间: 2009-10-20 19:48
这道题我也不明白我觉得only if是不是有点问题是不是要改为if only 那就好理解了

作者: joyviva 时间: 2009-10-20 20:34

我没有特别高深的道理，自己的想法如下：

用排除法。A:所有的plan都是不确定的，不合适。C/D是无关选项，干扰的。E:原文已经说确实是没有funding了

作者: joyviva 时间: 2009-10-20 20:50
我好想又有些明白了！原文没错，就是因为他用错only if plan,将plan当做有且仅有的办法，所以才不对啊！

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)