GWD32-Q1
The cause of the wreck of the ship Edmund Fitzgeraid in a severe storm on lake Superior is still unknown , when the sunken wreckage of the vessel was found, searchers discovered the hull in two pieces lying close together, The storm’s violent waves would have caused separate pieces floating even briefly on the surface to drift apart. Therefore, the breakup of the null can be ruled out as the cause of the sinking.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. Ships as large as the Edmund Fitzgerald rarely sink except in the most violent weather.
B. Under water currents at the time of the storm did not move the separated pieces of the hull together again.
C. Pieces of the hull would have sunk more quickly than the intact hull would have
D. The waves of the storm were not violent enough to have caused the breakup
E. If the ship broke up before sinking , the pieces of the hull would not have remained on the surface for very long
这句话没有读懂，The storm’s violent waves would have caused separate pieces floating even briefly on the surface to drift apart. 是说风暴引起的波浪即便只是与破裂船身短时间接触，但也应该已经导致了这破裂的部分漂浮然后互相越飘越远？？
那为什么就可以排除sinking这个原因呢？， 应该是排除storm不是么？
lz说的“那为什么就可以排除sinking这个原因呢？， 应该是排除storm不是么？”这句话是啥意思？
结论排除的是the breakup of the null 这个原因。
没明白你说的排除sinking、排除storm
lz说的“那为什么就可以排除sinking这个原因呢？， 应该是排除storm不是么？”饩浠笆巧兑馑迹?lt;/font> 结论排除的是the breakup of the null 这个原因。 没明白你说的排除sinking、排除storm
结论排除的是the breakup of the null 这个原因。
没明白你说的排除sinking、排除storm
不好意思，脑子晕了，没看到结论里面的， as "the cause of the "sinking...谢谢啊！
不好意思，脑子晕了，没看到结论里面的， as "the cause of the "sinking...谢谢啊！
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |