ChaseDream

标题: [求救]大全3-9 (未讨论过) [打印本页]

作者: WhiteScarf    时间: 2009-10-9 00:29
标题: [求救]大全3-9 (未讨论过)
In the past, teachers, bank tellers, and secretaries were predominantly men; these occupations slipped in pay and status when they became largely occupied by women. Therefore, if women become the majority in currently male-dominated professions like accounting, law, and medicine, the income and prestige of these professions will also drop.
9.    The argument above is based on
(A) another argument that contains circular reasoning
(B) an attempt to refute a generalization by means of an exceptional case
(C) an analogy between the past and the future
(D) an appeal to popular beliefs and values

答案是C

看到正确答案以后觉得没错

可是怎么解释A不对呢?

请教大家了,拜托帮帮忙阿各位,感激不尽



作者: overthere33    时间: 2009-10-9 01:25

a说循环论证  这里没有


作者: WhiteScarf    时间: 2009-10-9 01:53
可是他不就提了另一个例子,然后用同样的论点来解释吗
怎么样才叫循环论证?


作者: WhiteScarf    时间: 2009-10-9 02:02
查了一下循环论证的例子

跟这题的确不同

谢谢回答了!

EXAMPLE
1


    

A confused
student argues: “You can’t give me a C.  I’m an A student!”

    

Circular reasoning is
problematic because the claim is made on grounds that cannot be accepted
as true — because those very grounds are in dispute.  How can a student
claim to be an A student when he just earned a C?

    

To clarify, no one is
an “A student” by definition.  Grades are earned in every class and
are derived from a variety of different methods.  The requirements
in one class are set by the school and the instructor, so the same class
taught by a different teacher or in a different location should yield two
very different results (final grades).  Merely claiming to be an A
student does not make the claim valid.

    

NOTE: The false authority
fallacy also applies here — you cannot use yourself as your own authority
with total certainty.  A doctor is more qualified to diagnose your
shoulder pain than you are; your teachers are better qualified to evaluate
your performance than a student.

        
 

EXAMPLE
2

    

A satisfied
citizen says: “Richardson is the most successful mayor the town has ever
had because he's the best mayor of our history.”

    

The second part of this
sentence offers no evidence — it simply repeats the claim that was already
presented.  Don’t be fooled into believing that using the word “because”
in an argument automatically provides a valid reason.  Be sure to
provide clear evidence to support your claims, not a version of the premise
(the initial statement in an argument).

    

 
        
EXAMPLE
3

    

An
obvious non-smoker blurts: “Can a person quit smoking?  Of course
— as long as he has sufficient willpower and really wants to quit.”

    

This statement contains
a more subconscious version of circular reasoning.  The intended argument
simply repeats itself, disguised as a logical statement.  The warrant
is simple: “A person can quit because he can.”  True, any smoker can
quit, but the task is not as obvious or as easy to accomplish as the statement
suggests.  The arguer must provide reasons to suggest how a person
can overcome an addiction, not to simply identify the obvious use of will
power.  This example also falls into distortion and the only reason
fallacies.

    
 




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3