ChaseDream
标题: 急需一阵见血的讲解!!!在线等,谢谢 [打印本页]
作者: lurenyizcs 时间: 2009-10-1 19:28
标题: 急需一阵见血的讲解!!!在线等,谢谢
Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.
(A) prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills(C)
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
解释说:
D and E introduce constructions that, in context, are faulty. First of all, both bans that x cannot be done and bans that y cannot do x are unidiomatic formulations. Secondly, the negative cannot after bans is illogical.
Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.
(A) prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills(C)
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
解释说:
D and E introduce constructions that, in context, are faulty. First of all, both bans that x cannot be done and bans that y cannot do x are unidiomatic formulations. Secondly, the negative cannot after bans is illogical.
我选了E,我的理解是,that引导抽象名词bans的同位语;可别处的讨论都不认可同位语的说法,不知道为什么????
并且当时考虑到了,ing分词作定语修饰的是普片性的,客观性的事物,此题选C就表示:bans天生就是用来 prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings 的,这样的话就不合理了。但上XDF的时候,老师讲过:法令、法规一般用ing修饰,这我就不清楚了,是对它们内容的修饰用ing还是对它们本身的修饰呢????(有点纠结,说的不是很清楚)
渴望牛牛们的清晰讲解,能列举些类似的题目最好!!!!
[此贴子已经被作者于2009/10/1 19:28:47编辑过]
作者: reika1054 时间: 2009-10-1 19:43
我认为是诠释ban的内容。下面这句话是诠释law的内容。
11. (25059-!-item-!-188;#058&002009)
Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other
water bikes from the tranquil waters of Puget Sound,
a judge overturned the ban on the ground of violating state laws for
allowing the use of personal watercraft on common waterways.
(A) of violating state laws for allowing
(B) of their violating state laws to allow
(C) that it violates state laws that allowed
(D) that it violated
state laws allowing
(E) that state laws were being violated allowing
作者: melodyflying 时间: 2009-10-1 19:54
lz你的思路很奇怪
修饰 bans用that引导的从句和用ing形式后置定语修饰按理都是可以接受的
但是D E 犯了个大禁忌
ban怎么可以后面跟否定表达 cannot呢 ban本来就有否定禁止的意思 再来一个cannot否定 重复罗嗦 不符合语言习惯
就如opposition aganist 放在gmat句子里是错的是一个道理
其次 个人意见是ban后面不管跟什么 还是动词的subject为ban比较好
D Ethat 从句的动作发出者变成了leaves, brush, and grass clippings 和landfills 且D用被动 不如主动来的明晰
都没有C中以ban为subject 发出动作prohibit来的好
这是个习惯问题
[此贴子已经被作者于2009/10/1 19:56:39编辑过]
作者: lurenyizcs 时间: 2009-10-1 19:56
我贴的那道题答案是C啊,也就是理解成同位语是不对的
on the ground that 是固定搭配,和我说的题不太一样
谢谢你
作者: lurenyizcs 时间: 2009-10-1 20:02
恩,感谢melody的解释
不过我就还有一点不清楚,把E选项看成bans的同位语语法上正不正确??? 如果正确的话,你所说的:ban怎么可以后面跟否定表达 cannot呢 ban本来就有否定禁止的意思。。。。。同位语么,当然是解释bans的,既然解释的话,就是说禁止什么什么的啦
还有就是 “修饰 bans用that引导的从句和用ing形式后置定语修饰按理都是可以接受的”,这个我还是理解不了,跟书上的说法不一样啊
作者: melodyflying 时间: 2009-10-1 20:12
ban的内容是要表达什么东西不能怎么样
这个没错
但是就是因为ban不可以后面跟否定的表达 又要表达意思
所以才选C 答案是比较出来的
lurenyizcs不要纠结于到底是修饰本身还是内容了
that和ing后置定语修饰都是可接受的
重点看后面的表达
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |