ChaseDream

标题: OG 12th--CR No.100 求助~!! [打印本页]

作者: reneedu    时间: 2009-9-30 23:51
标题: OG 12th--CR No.100 求助~!!

One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called “benchmarking,” permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:

(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the comparisons already employs.

(B) Getting “inside” information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult.

(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency,only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors.

(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry.

(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products or markets.

这一题的问题到底在讲什么?我被题目搞晕了···也不知道选什么···

OG的解释说的是

Which one condition does NOT recommend benchmarking against noncompetitors? Which one condition IS a well-founded reason to benchmark against competitors?

我实在是···没把这个和那一长串题目联系起来···


作者: overthere33    时间: 2009-10-1 02:04

问题问的是: 如果一个公司用benchmarking来和非竞争对手而不是竞争对手来比较 下面哪一个不是好理由


作者: reneedu    时间: 2009-10-2 20:00

意思就是要给与noncompetitors竞争找一个理由?

support题?


作者: langrenly    时间: 2009-10-4 02:36

答案是E吧?这道题的意思就是如果这个benchmark法真的管用的话,哪个选项不能说明benchmark只能用在非行业对手身上?或者说哪个选项不能说明benchmark不适用于同行业对手?

E选项基本没涉及问题内容,还略有support的意味,如果最后一个their是指代competition的话


作者: kevin2ff    时间: 2009-10-6 21:44
E吧, 这道题衡量的标准是 manager discover practice     而E说的是practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products or mark 
作者: jinwch    时间: 2009-12-3 13:19
题目是问:以下选项,如果正确,会有理由来说明benchmarking用以衡量公司和其它非竞争的公司的表现,而不是和竞争的公司的表现是合理(或有效)的,除了。。。
等同于,要你在选项中找出一个来证明benchmarking用以衡量公司与非竞争公司的表现是不合理的,与竞争公司的表现是合理的。
A,和竞争公司相比较,只会有很少的新的实践,因此需要benchmarking against非竞争公司.(反面支持)
B.得到竞争对手的"绝招"很难,因此.....(反面支持)
C.和竞争对手之间在efficiency有某种程度的相同,只有benchmarking against非竞争公司才能得到...(正面支持)
D.经理们更易于接受来自于自己所处行业以外的观点,即从非竞争者处。(正面支持)
E.好公司的大多数成功是由于他们采取了那些利用了他们特殊的市场环境的操作。(实际上是benchmarking against 竞争公司)
作者: vedocq    时间: 2010-3-17 14:45
看懂了 谢谢
作者: queenie1987    时间: 2010-11-25 21:57
谢谢!
作者: 缨络    时间: 2010-11-27 14:15
我觉得是E 但是完全是排除法 因为前四个都是很明确的支持了应该benchmarking against non-competitor 虽然E我根本没看懂什么意思
作者: Charline_chang    时间: 2014-5-18 14:27
jinwch 发表于 2009-12-3 13:19
题目是问:以下选项,如果正确,会有理由来说明benchmarking用以衡量公司和其它非竞争的公司的表现,而不是 ...

很清晰,谢谢你!!!




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3