With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have grown to exceed
A. With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the
B. With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that do not allow hunting, wildlife officials' estimate of the deer population in
C. With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, the deer population in
D. Without natural predators and no hunting allowed in expanse of green suburban neighborhoods, New Jersey has a deer population that wildlife officials estimate to have
E. Without natural predators and with expanses of green neighborhoods where there is no hunting, wildlife officials in
A: with no A and B,B的表达有歧义不知道是否和no平行;officials做主语和with不搭配
B: officials做主语和with不搭配; estimate has grown 逻辑不通
C: correct
D: New Jersey做主语和with不搭配
E: officials做主语和with不搭配
prep 语法笔记73题,笔记上指出with短语要和主语能在逻辑上吻合,但是疑问?
with这这里应该是做独立主格结构的吧,独立主格是不是和主句主语没有必然的联系啊?????
或者还是做别的成分? 如果不是独立主格是做介词短语的话,和主句主语有没有逻辑一致的要求呢?对这个问题始终很纠结
麻烦哪位NN给解释下吧,谢谢了
再次顶上来,哪位NN帮帮忙解答下吧,一直对所谓逻辑主语这个东西很疑惑呢?
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |