ChaseDream

标题: 求一道OG 思路 [打印本页]

作者: zhang200824 时间: 2009-9-25 22:41
标题: 求一道OG 思路
100. One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called "benchmarking," permits the manager of a company to disvover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:

A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the comparisons already employs.

B) Getting 'inside " information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult

C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors.

D) Managers are generally more recptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry.

E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products or markets.

题的意思也没弄懂，真个很乱，求思路

作者: skyzhang 时间: 2009-9-25 23:06

benchmarking ...其实就是一种同业对比的意思。比较自己的公司和其他类似的公司，来总结自己哪里不好。

问题可以理解是：以下有四个选项是支持“应该和非竞争企业比较，不应该和竞争企业比较”问哪四个？

A：和竞争者比较让经理focus在已经掌握的战术。既然都掌握了，就不能 for the adoption of good practices。所以还是“应该和非竞争企业比较，不应该和竞争企业比较”

B：了解竞争者的内部消息非常非常难。所以还是“应该和非竞争企业比较，不应该和竞争企业比较”

C：竞争者的效率差不多，非竞争者的经验才能提高自己的水平。所以还是“应该和非竞争企业比较，不应该和竞争企业比较”

D：经理更容易接受自己产业以外的学来的经验。所以还是“应该和非竞争企业比较，不应该和竞争企业比较”

E：好像么啥关系。

作者: zhang200824 时间: 2009-9-25 23:14
啊~~~理解了　ＴＨＸ

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)