ChaseDream

标题: 请教OG12-SC133 [打印本页]

作者: LZBNJJ    时间: 2009-9-23 10:38
标题: 请教OG12-SC133
发贴心情
请教OG12-SC133

本题涉及到了分词修饰,时态不一致却正确的一些比较难理解的知识点~高人解释下哈~


作者: sylviadyh    时间: 2009-10-3 01:32

同问。把题目也贴上来

133. Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp’s ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.
(A) requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect
(B) requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
(C) that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect
(D) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting
(E) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
答案是选(B),不太明白OG中对(D)选项的解释“To require obscures the urpose of the laws"

这里怎么区别requiring和to require?请NN们指教


作者: JJJooe    时间: 2009-10-3 02:09
这个问题我也思考过
一般to do不定式放在名词后句子前面是有动词的吧
因为to do不定式表达目的所以前面有动词比较常见
当然也有就是名词后放不定式的
那就一定要是这个名词的目的就是xxx才能这么用了

除此以外一般修饰名词
要不就是定语从句
要不就是动名词作后置定语喽

作者: sylviadyh    时间: 2009-10-3 13:13

TKS~~明白点啦~~


作者: sunnyice    时间: 2010-4-12 19:52
OG的解释是,requiring在这道题里是最简洁直接地修饰laws的方法。如果用to require,则表明laws的目的是require...,而其实law的目的是to protect. 所以要用requiring而不用to require。
作者: zty198747    时间: 2010-5-13 10:14
如果C选项把protect改成protects是正确答案吗?OG后面的解释说“that requir”是冗长不必要的。为什么呀?
作者: kunming    时间: 2010-5-17 23:34


批判的看哈
that在这里是定语从句,定law,而that又在定从中作主语,所以可以省略。
如果that后面接完整的主谓,则that引的是同位,则不可省略,但这里不是。所以不可以省略!
作者: fansail    时间: 2010-7-28 16:19
OG10的解释比较清楚:

To use an infinitive, to require, seems to indicate that requiring these devices is the objective of the laws, when in fact the objective is to protect the sea turtles.
作者: flyfighter    时间: 2012-2-22 00:18
为什么C选项中的require不能修饰Law,然后require + protect 构成虚拟语气呢?
作者: billxxyy    时间: 2012-2-22 05:54
法律内容一律用ing形式。
作者: rocer    时间: 2012-3-11 10:35
为什么C选项中的require不能修饰Law,然后require + protect 构成虚拟语气呢?
-- by 会员 flyfighter (2012/2/22 0:18:25)


你好,require+proctet不能构成一句话,因为这不符合这个句子的逻辑意思。

这个句子的逻辑意思是:将turtle-excluder devices安装在shrimp网的要求保护了adult sea turtles,而不是要求保护。

另外,require有两种用法:
require+that+clause
require sb to do sth

body verb 的具体用法,你们可以参考一下表格
Type

Word

Example

Verbs that take only the command subjunctive



Demand, dictate, insist, propose, recommend, request, stipulate, suggest

We demand that he be here.

Verbs that take only infinitive



Advise, allow, forbid, persuade, want

We allow him to be here.

Verbs that take either form



Ask, beg, intend, order, prefer, urge, require

We require that he be here.

We require him to be here.

Nouns that take the command subjunctive

Demand, request

His demand that he be paid full severance was not met.

Adjectives that take the command subjunctive

Advisable, crucial, desirable, fitting, imperative, important, mandatory, preferable, urgent, vital

It is essential that Gary be ready before soon.


欢迎拍砖~~

作者: 觞释    时间: 2012-4-12 20:55
谢谢解答~~表格很有用~~~
为什么C选项中的require不能修饰Law,然后require + protect 构成虚拟语气呢?
-- by 会员 flyfighter (2012/2/22 0:18:25)



你好,require+proctet不能构成一句话,因为这不符合这个句子的逻辑意思。

这个句子的逻辑意思是:将turtle-excluder devices安装在shrimp网的要求保护了adult sea turtles,而不是要求保护。

另外,require有两种用法:
require+that+clause
require sb to do sth

body verb 的具体用法,你们可以参考一下表格
Type

Word

Example

Verbs that take only the command subjunctive



Demand, dictate, insist, propose, recommend, request, stipulate, suggest

We demand that he be here.

Verbs that take only infinitive



Advise, allow, forbid, persuade, want

We allow him to be here.

Verbs that take either form



Ask, beg, intend, order, prefer, urge, require

We require that he be here.

We require him to be here.

Nouns that take the command subjunctive

Demand, request

His demand that he be paid full severance was not met.

Adjectives that take the command subjunctive

Advisable, crucial, desirable, fitting, imperative, important, mandatory, preferable, urgent, vital

It is essential that Gary be ready before soon.


欢迎拍砖~~
-- by 会员 rocer (2012/3/11 10:35:43)


作者: sodalight    时间: 2012-9-29 14:39
为什么C选项中的require不能修饰Law,然后require + protect 构成虚拟语气呢?
-- by 会员 flyfighter (2012/2/22 0:18:25)



分析一下正确选项先,

先看一下牛津上面require的用法:
verb (not usually used in the progressive tenses) (formal)  不过注意一下,这个题里的requiring 并非进行时态,而是分词作定语修饰laws.
to need sth; to depend on sb/sth: [VN] These pets require a lot of care and attention. ◆ Deciphering the code requires an expert. ◆ This condition requires urgent treatment. ◆ Do you require anything else? (= in a shop / store, for example) [VN to inf] True marriage requires us to show trust and loyalty. ◆ [V that] The situation required that he be present. ◆ (BrE also) The situation required that he should be present. ◆ [V -ing] Lentils do not require soaking before cooking.
[often passive] ~ sth (of sb) to make sb do or have sth, especially because it is necessary according to a particular law or set of rules: [VN] What exactly is required of a receptionist (= what are they expected to do)? ◆ The wearing of seat belts is required by law. ◆ 'Hamlet' is required reading (= must be read) for this course. ◆ Several students failed to reach the required standard. ◆ I just require a signature on the form. ◆ [VN to inf] All candidates will be required to take a short test. [also V that]

我们看了以后发现正确答案里的require应该是这个意思:
to need sth; to depend on sb/sth: [VN] These pets require a lot of care and attention. ◆ Deciphering the code requires an expert. ◆ This condition requires urgent treatment. ◆ Do you require anything else? (= in a shop / store, for example)
也就是require后面+名词
所以希望XDJM们不要急着把require翻译成 要求/需要 什么的。直接去看牛津吧。。


现在我们把这个句子简化一下。
Last week LS held a conference to ... , saying that their complaince with laws is protecting adult sea turtles.
(备注一下,OG里说了is protecting 的主语是complaince 所以我不同意楼上的“ 要求 保护海龟”的说法)
而requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets 是laws的定语。paraphrase 一下就是 laws (depended on  一个 XXX的device)。


现在再来剖析C答案,用“为什么C选项中的require不能修饰Law,然后require + protect 构成虚拟语气呢? ”这种思路
先看 后半部分:laws that require XXX设备 protect adult sea turtle.

对照牛津字典,我们可以发现这里的require的用法是:
to need sth; to depend on sb/sth: [V that] The situation required that he be present. 也就是require后面加从句

一切看起来都很和谐(所以我第一次也选了C,而且百思不解为什么不选C!)

但是我们现在把整个句子拿出来
Last week LS held a conference to ... , saying that their complaince with laws that ...
我们可以注意到:saying that 后面的那个从句 它没有了谓语动词!!!!! 找到原因了吧~呼    

作者: fmcenji    时间: 2014-9-17 19:59
E选项结构正确,与B选项的区别之处在于修饰law,一个用doing,表示现在以前都存在的,一个用to do表示以后才有的,从原文非划线部分来看,这法律已经实施了,所以选B更合适。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3