ChaseDream

标题: OG12-93未讨论 [打印本页]

作者: wildeyes 时间: 2009-9-17 17:49
标题: OG12-93未讨论
93. Heating-oil prices are expected to be higher this year than last because refiners are paving about S5 a barrel more for crude oil than thev were last year.

(A) Heating-oil prices are expected to be higher this year than last because refiners are paying about $5 a barrel more for crude oil than they were

(B) Heating-oil prices are expected to rise higher this year over last because refiners pay about $5 a barrel for crude oil more than they did

(C) Expectations are for heating-oil prices to be higher this year than last year's because refiners are paying about $5 a barrel for crude oil more than they did

(D) It is the expectation that heating-oil prices will be higher for this year over last because refiners are paying about $5 a barrel more for crude oil now than what they were

(E) It is expected that heating-oil prices will rise higher this year than last year's because refiners pay about $5 a barrel for crude oil more than they did

答案A, 但是有个疑问，A里面 Heating-oil prices are expected to be higher this year than last because...
prices 和 last year 比较？这怎么解释？

恳请广大CDer赐教啊！

[此贴子已经被作者于2009/9/17 18:07:43编辑过]

作者: wildeyes 时间: 2009-9-17 18:10
顶，盼望好心人出现

作者: skyemily 时间: 2009-9-17 22:49

个人觉得应该不是像你勾出来的那样prices和last相比较，而是this year than last

是个省略了的结构

作者: 孤独狂欢 时间: 2009-9-17 23:06
是this year 和 last year比较啊

作者: wildeyes 时间: 2009-9-17 23:28
不是应该加个those of last 才能和prices比啊？这种省略规则是怎样的呢？

作者: Deboisseu 时间: 2009-9-17 23:37

比较的应该是higher的修饰对象吧？应该比的是prices我觉得。

作者: skyemily 时间: 2009-9-18 00:14

例句：Arctic ice shrinks less this year than last.

参见 http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080924/full/455441f.html

感觉这更多是一种习惯用法，如果往细了说应该就是按逻辑意思省略掉重复的部分，因为last在此处明显指last year。

不知道这样说有没有解决楼主的疑问，也欢迎各位NN拍砖~

作者: wildeyes 时间: 2009-9-18 10:09
谢谢楼上MM！

作者: neomatrix 时间: 2009-9-18 11:20

简言之就是prices this year are higher than (prices) last (year)

但不能用prices of this year结构，因为year是不能有价格的；因此也就不能用those of last

[此贴子已经被作者于2009/9/18 11:22:39编辑过]

作者: lzj1209 时间: 2009-10-3 21:20

以下是引用neomatrix在2009/9/18 11:20:00的发言：

简言之就是prices this year are higher than (prices) last (year)

但不能用prices of this year结构，因为year是不能有价格的；因此也就不能用those of last

确实。那整个句子补全是什麽样的呢？望NN解答！

作者: jinqijia 时间: 2009-10-3 21:35
学习

作者: smallashley 时间: 2009-12-17 16:59
up

作者: 尘未 时间: 2010-3-4 23:35

简言之就是prices this year are higher than (prices) last (year)
但不能用prices of this year结构，因为year是不能有价格的；因此也就不能用those of last

[此贴子已经被作者于2009/9/18 11:22:39编辑过]

-- by 会员 neomatrix (2009/9/18 11:20:00)

这个解释最后一句感觉很牵强啊。。。
OG12-逻辑29
states that companies starting up this year will create no more jobs than last
year’s start-ups.

上面的这种形式也是存在的。前后比较也不对称啊，为什么不省略呢

用其他方式也能比较出来A稍好一些，
但想知道这类比较是必须省略么，当年代比较时，last year's price省略成last？

作者: 尘未 时间: 2010-3-5 16:55

简言之就是prices this year are higher than (prices) last (year)
但不能用prices of this year结构，因为year是不能有价格的；因此也就不能用those of last

[此贴子已经被作者于2009/9/18 11:22:39编辑过]

-- by 会员 neomatrix (2009/9/18 11:20:00)

-- by 会员尘未 (2010/3/4 23:35:55)

好像明了。。。
原题是状语比较，即price this year 比较price last year, 所以可以省略主谓宾

下面的是主语比较，this year's start-ups 比较 last year’s start-ups。。。可是感觉还是应该补出动词啊。。。

求教

作者: JayNicholas 时间: 2010-3-5 22:58
这个其实就是比较句的省略现象比较的是今年和去年的油价补出来就是 OIL PRICE IN LAST YEAR

作者: rx_11 时间: 2010-4-7 10:03
我觉得
Heating-oil prices are expected to be higher this year than the price of last year 也不对··因为this year 是个副词，造成了只能像原句那样改才可以·····我的猜测正确么？高人求证··

作者: rx_11 时间: 2010-4-7 10:08
另外问一下··B选项ETS的解释更奇怪：说more than must immediately follow barrel~~~这又是为何呢？？求高人解答···

还有一个问题，B选项ETS这么解释了，但是CE选项ETS并没有这么说，这是因为CE 的more than并没有像B的这种错误呢,还是ETS因为说了B就不在CE中这么写了。。省点墨水?求解·~~~

作者: micro418 时间: 2010-4-13 03:08
今天也看到这个题，有着和大家一样的疑问，翻阅资料后得到如下信息，欢迎大家拍砖。
首先要搞清楚是状语比较还是介宾比较还是主谓比较。
1.状语比较都要省略前面的主谓结构，状语比较没有歧义，所以主谓没必要重复。即：如果遇到状语比较，直接比较状语部分就可以，添加主谓就是画蛇添足。
Halley's comet cause such a worldwide sensation In no other historical sighting as (it did) in its return of 1910-1911。

In no other election did Obama cause such a sensation as (he did) in his presidential race of 2008.

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion (in this election) than (the proportion) in any previous election.（新PREP2-197 ）

Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies
(for this campaign)than (the supplies) for any previous campaign, it had provisions for only twenty-four days.（OG10-198）

这个题就是状语比较 this year 比 last year。

2. 介宾比较 A do sth of C1 by D1 than of C2 by D2.（C1C2，D1D2对等名词）
Rice has protein of higher quality than of lower quality(介宾比较，of higher 与 of lower比）

3. 主谓比较这个非常常见，如果前后谓语一样，直接可以省略谓语动词甚至助动词。

if you have a parallel construction involving tensed verbs, and the tensed verb is EXACTLY THE SAME in both (or all, if there are more than 2) parts of the construction, then you may omit the verb in all but the first part.

for instance:
the rain was torrential and the wind fierce.
in this case, we're allowed to omit the second 'was', because it's identical to the 'was' in the first part.

推荐牛贴比较之庖丁解牛http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-103101-1-1.html

作者: micro418 时间: 2010-4-13 03:09
另外上面那个
OG12-逻辑29
states that companies starting up this year will create no more jobs than last
year’s start-ups.

是典型的主谓比较，去年的公司创造的就业机会与今年的公司创造的就业机会比较，直接把create也就是do省掉就行了。当然写成states that companies starting up this year will create no more jobs than last
year’s start-ups do. 也可以

作者: abjure 时间: 2010-5-19 15:48
upup.

good sharing micro418

作者: maweijiamwj 时间: 2010-8-17 00:45
我来说一下我的看法吧

这个题想表达的意思是：人们预期 Heating-oil 的价格会上涨因为精炼一桶油的花费今年比上年要多5刀

B：over 应该用 than（或者over就算对，higher也与more than重复）

C: 根据 parallel 把 C ( they did 与 are paying ... for 平行应该用were）排除

D:it is the expectation that … 不简洁 (E 里用动词都不简洁何况名词呢！）

E:it is expected that … 不简洁而且 year's 也不对，因为XDF老师说在GMAT里没有生命的是不能用所有格的

这里的完整句子应该是：Hearting-oils prices are expected to be higher this year than last(year省略) because refiners are paying … more for crude oil than they were (paying for)…

请CDer们指正

作者: xiaoxiao4499 时间: 2010-9-8 21:24

今天也看到这个题，有着和大家一样的疑问，翻阅资料后得到如下信息，欢迎大家拍砖。
首先要搞清楚是状语比较还是介宾比较还是主谓比较。
1.状语比较都要省略前面的主谓结构，状语比较没有歧义，所以主谓没必要重复。即：如果遇到状语比较，直接比较状语部分就可以，添加主谓就是画蛇添足。
Halley's comet cause such a worldwide sensation In no other historical sighting as (it did) in its return of 1910-1911。

In no other election did Obama cause such a sensation as (he did) in his presidential race of 2008.

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion (in this election) than (the proportion) in any previous election.（新PREP2-197 ）

Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies
(for this campaign)than (the supplies) for any previous campaign, it had provisions for only twenty-four days.（OG10-198）

这个题就是状语比较 this year 比 last year。

2. 介宾比较 A do sth of C1 by D1 than of C2 by D2.（C1C2，D1D2对等名词）
Rice has protein of higher quality than of lower quality(介宾比较，of higher 与 of lower比）

3. 主谓比较这个非常常见，如果前后谓语一样，直接可以省略谓语动词甚至助动词。

if you have a parallel construction involving tensed verbs, and the tensed verb is EXACTLY THE SAME in both (or all, if there are more than 2) parts of the construction, then you may omit the verb in all but the first part.

for instance:
the rain was torrential and the wind fierce.
in this case, we're allowed to omit the second 'was', because it's identical to the 'was' in the first part.

推荐牛贴比较之庖丁解牛http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-103101-1-1.html

-- by 会员 micro418 (2010/4/13 3:08:04)

佩服佩服！
将OG,GWD,PP整理一起~~谢谢

作者: 逆水潜龙 时间: 2011-11-25 21:57

另外上面那个
OG12-逻辑29
states that companies starting up this year will create no more jobs than last
year’s start-ups.

是典型的主谓比较，去年的公司创造的就业机会与今年的公司创造的就业机会比较，直接把create也就是do省掉就行了。当然写成states that companies starting up this year will create no more jobs than last
year’s start-ups do. 也可以

-- by 会员 micro418 (2010/4/13 3:09:54)

我觉得还是补出do比较合适哈。
companies starting up this year will create jobs 是个主谓宾完整句子。this year是修饰主语的，如果 companies starting up this year will create no more jobs than last
year’s start-ups 有可能理解成今年成立的公司creat 《jobs比creat去年成立的多。》
可转化为简单句。I eat apple faster than you eat. 如果省略eat，就变成《吃苹果快过吃你》了。

作者: yayachen 时间: 2011-11-28 03:53
加问三个有点傻的问题

1、选项解析没写但BE的“rise higher”是不是有wordy的问题呢？

2、BC选项应该都存在“more than should immediately follow $5 a barrel”这个问题吧，我的理解是句意应该是“每桶比去年多付$5”，而BC可以理解成“每桶付了$5，比去年多”。不知道这么理解B选项的OG解析对不对。

3、在做的过程中纠结了一下“they were"和“they did”这个问题，解析中并没有提到，如果parallel的话应该选和are paying平行的“were”吧？但是解析中没有提到BCE选项的did错了的问题。。。。

求解！！！

作者: wildmantomba 时间: 2011-11-30 07:49

加问三个有点傻的问题

1、选项解析没写但BE的“rise higher”是不是有wordy的问题呢？

2、BC选项应该都存在“more than should immediately follow $5 a barrel”这个问题吧，我的理解是句意应该是“每桶比去年多付$5”，而BC可以理解成“每桶付了$5，比去年多”。不知道这么理解B选项的OG解析对不对。

3、在做的过程中纠结了一下“they were"和“they did”这个问题，解析中并没有提到，如果parallel的话应该选和are paying平行的“were”吧？但是解析中没有提到BCE选项的did错了的问题。。。。

求解！！！

-- by 会员 yayachen (2011/11/28 3:53:26)

我跟LS的想法一样，也是认为
1、rise higher是redundant
2、BC的结构改变原本的句意
3、C动词不平衡（are paying 配对上 did)

但还有一个问题想跟大家求教的是

在本题中使用现在进行时与现代简单时的句意差别在哪里呢？

作者: zhongshanlh 时间: 2012-3-27 19:23
第三个问题是省略原则的问题，一般情况下be、do与have做助动词的时候为了简洁期间，某些时候可以省略原来的实意动词用这几个助动词的合理形式来代替，但是一个原则就是省略的实意动词的应当存在的方式必须在原句中前面的位置出现过，如果没有出现过的话那么是不可以省略的。比如C中前面出现的形式是-ing形式，而后面省略的是动词原形，因此该省略和替换的使用就是错误的。

-- by 会员 yayachen (2011/11/28 3:53:26)

-- by 会员 wildmantomba (2011/11/30 7:49:26)

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)