ChaseDream
标题: [求助]OG12-114 [打印本页]
作者: 金布布 时间: 2009-9-15 12:17
标题: [求助]OG12-114
114. Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout thecountry and have noticed that in those built before1930 the quality of the original carpentry work isgenerally superior to that in hotels built afterward.Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930typically worked with more skill, care, and effort thancarpenters who have worked on hotels builtsubsequently.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakensthe guidebook writer’s argument?
(A) The quality of original carpentry in hotels isgenerally far superior to the quality of originalcarpentry in other structures, such as housesand stores.
(B) Hotels built since 1930 can generallyaccommodate more guests than those builtbefore 1930.
(C) The materials available to carpenters workingbefore 1930 were not signifi cantly different inquality from the materials available tocarpenters working after 1930.
(D) The better the quality of original carpentry in abuilding, the less likely that building is to fall intodisuse and be demolished.
(E) The average length of apprenticeship forcarpenters has declined signifi cantly since 1930.
这是道新题 请大家看看 帮忙解释一下为什么选D 谢谢大家了
作者: GMAT_onjob 时间: 2009-9-15 13:52
writer:在1930年之后修建hotel的质量比1930年之前的好,所以1930年前的木工要比之后的好
(A)无关项 far superior to the quality of originalcarpentry in other structures, such as housesand stores.
(B)无关项:没有讨论容量
(C)否定题目项,如果成立则和题目的finding矛盾
(D)只有质量好的才能保存至今,题目的发现其实是在哪1930年前质量很好的房子和之后房子的平均水品去比较,论断是建立在不对等的调查数据上的比较,结论自然也就是不可靠的。削弱 ---correct
(E)加强项,说明1930年后的木工没有得到很好的训练和学习
作者: 金布布 时间: 2009-9-15 14:52
哈 明白啦 谢谢
作者: ken178 时间: 2010-8-21 11:49
这题用排除发可以选到d,但是不明白为什么不具代表性呢
作者: jasondream 时间: 2010-9-5 10:54
标题: 还是有些不太明白
虽然其他的选项可以排除,但是d选项还是搞不太清楚
答案说质量好的建筑可以存活至今,不被损毁,就算只有1个建筑,也能说明现在的建筑不如当时的建筑啊,从原文中可以知道他住了那么多酒店,老建筑都比后来的建筑好,就算大部分不好的建筑都毁坏了,那么我们现在的建筑没有一个建筑能和老建筑相比,也证明了整体工艺水平不如老建筑啊,所以还是不明白为什么削弱了,痛苦~~求救!!
作者: lhf80 时间: 2010-9-5 23:30
整个题目隐射意思是, 30年前的宾馆质量好, 是因为质量好的宾馆多,是一个统计里面的分布,也就是30年现存质量好的宾馆相对30年现存宾馆总数的比例比30年后的比例高。看下面的公式。
a: number of high quality hotel built before 1930
A: number of all existing hotel built before 1930
b: number of high quality hotel built afterward
B: number of all existing hotel built afterward
conclusion: a/A>b/B
选项d是减少A的数量,这样有可能使不等式反转。
这个题目也太隐晦了。
作者: lhf80 时间: 2010-9-5 23:34
而且这个题目我认为b的话可以容纳的人多,说明建筑质量好啊。比如高楼建筑比30年前平房肯定好啊。他因不行吗?为什么用排除法直接排除b?
作者: josielqian 时间: 2011-3-1 21:25
个人觉得这道题D选项是引入了他因法。原文逻辑是因为过去酒店质量好比现在好(B)所以说过去木工比现在更有skill(A)。但是D选项给出了过去酒店质量好的另一种可能性就是质量越好的建筑保存时间越长(A‘)。导致B无法推出来A了。B也有可能推出A’。A就不是B的必要条件了。。
作者: boozy 时间: 2011-3-3 10:32
应该是他因。
GW作者给出的事实是1930年以前的酒店木质装修、物品的质量比其后的要好。注意是现在的质量相互对比。他给出的原因是建设老酒店的木匠技术好,干活认真。削弱他给出的解释,必须首先接受他说的事实,但给出的理由不对。
B选项说,老酒店接待的人更多。这容易让人联想起木材家俱的损耗,但文中并没有说损耗的事,也和木匠手艺没关系,所以既不支持又不反对。
D选项说,刚建成的质量越好,使用的时候越会小心,并且很少损坏。这就引入“使用”、“损坏”的概念。也就是说,是因为老酒店的保养好、损坏少才导致现在的老酒店比新酒店的木质装饰和用品质量更好。暗含如果新酒店也注意使用和维护的话,虽然当年刚建成的时候其质量未必如老酒店的一样好,但经历长时间使用后也可能不比老的酒店差(毕竟老酒店的东西用了更长的时间)。所以是正确选项。
作者: 像风一样离去 时间: 2011-3-16 11:23
我其实想问,E项是答案无疑,但是apprenticeship的时间长短等于技术好坏不?我觉得实习时间和技术水平之间还是有差异的。
作者: 像风一样离去 时间: 2011-3-16 11:26
哎呀,我二了,答案是D,我笔记本上标了个E有疑问,我错了。
但还是对E的解释不理解啊,实习时间和技术水平有联系么?ETS怎么说the longer a carpenter works as an apprentice, the more skill he or she is apt to have ?请求解释一下。
再为我的错误道歉,请大家多多包涵。
作者: davidliuscu 时间: 2011-3-27 23:17
apprenticeship: 学徒。
GMAC逻辑:整个行业,平均学徒时间越长->行业平均技术水平越高
作者: zyzrafa 时间: 2011-3-28 04:34
D 是说只有质量好的才留下来了 也就是说说不定30年前的也有很多质量不好的 但是因为没有流传下来就没有被用来作比较
作者: 像风一样离去 时间: 2011-3-30 13:56
回11楼的davidliuscu:
这个是GMAC的逻辑吗?确定?学徒时间越长,技术越高?还是你自己总结的啊?有其他例子么?
作者: davidliuscu 时间: 2011-4-3 17:15
请看一下OG12-CR10, GMAC对E项错误原因的解释,就用到了题目以外的信息(common sense?)
10. Cable-television spokesperson: Subscriptions to cable television are a bargain in comparison to “free” television.
Remember that “free” television is not really free. It is consumers, in the end, who pay for the costly advertising
that supports “free” television.
Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the position of the cable-television spokesperson?
(A) Consumers who do not own television sets are less likely to be in?uenced in their purchasing decisions by
television advertising than are consumers who own television sets.
(B) Subscriptions to cable television include access to some public-television channels, which do not accept
advertising.
(C) For locations with poor television reception, cable television provides picture quality superior to that
provided by free television.
(D) There is as much advertising on many cable-television channels as there is on “free” television channels.
(E) Cable-television subscribers can choose which channels they wish to receive.
OG对E项的解释
“E Television viewers who do not watch cable channels have a choice as to which channels and
programs they view. For example, they could watch channels with no advertising. So this
information does not di? erentiate cable-television viewers from “free”-television viewers.”
the correct answer is D.
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |