99. Concetta:
Franchot was a great writer because she was ahead of her time in understanding
that industrialization was taking an unconscionable toll on the family structure
of the working class.
Alicia: Franchot
was not a great writer. The mark of a great writer is the ability to move
people with the power of the written word, not the ability to be among the
first to grasp a social issue. Besides, the social consequences of
industrialization were widely understood in Franchot’s day.
In her
disagreement with Concetta, Alicia does which one of the following?
A.
accepts Concetta’s criterion
and then adds evidence to Concetta’s case
B.
discredits Concetta’s evidence
and then generalizes from new evidence
C.
rejects Concetta’s criterion
and then disputes a specific claim
D.
disputes Concetta’s conclusion
and then presents facts in support of an alternative creterion
E.
attacks one of Concetta’s
claims and then criticizes the structure of her argumen
答案是C 但是我觉得像D 因为A人直接先否定了C人的观点， 然后提出了A人对好作家的看法， 然后还提出了个事实反驳了C人
不知道为什么是C ， 请教思路
我觉得是C阿，
"Alicia: Franchot was not a great writer."
C. rejects Concetta’s criterion
Alicia的结论直接出来是反驳的呀
然后是去讨论“The mark of a great writer ”
所以自然是C and then disputes a specific claim
我觉得是C阿，
"Alicia: Franchot was not a great writer."
C. rejects Concetta’s criterion
Alicia的结论直接出来是反驳的呀
然后是去讨论“The mark of a great writer ”
所以自然是C and then disputes a specific claim
选C The mark of a great writer is the ability to move people with the power of the written word, not the ability to be among the first to grasp a social issue A反驳了C对作家评价的标准 Besides, the social consequences of industrialization were widely understood in Franchot’s day 这句是disputes a specific claim
D中说的then presents facts in support of an alternative creterion 但是A并没有去证明他的creterion
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |