ChaseDream

标题: OG 47 [打印本页]

作者: aimcreate    时间: 2004-3-11 00:54
标题: OG 47
OG-47isplays of the aurora borealis, or"northern lights,"can heat the atmosphere over the arctic enough to affect the trajectories of ballistic missiles,induce electric currents that can cause balckouts in some areas and corrosion in north-south pipelines.
A)to affect the trajectories of ballistic missiles,induce
B)that the trajectories of ballistic missiles are affected,induce
C)that it affects the trajectories of ballistic missiles,induces
D)that the trajectories of ballistic missiles are affected and induces
E)to affect the trajectories of ballistic missiles and induce
我选择了A),为什么是E),我弄不懂这里的结构


作者: ca3ltoys    时间: 2004-3-11 01:39
关键是A中induce前的逗号,那么这里induce就应该用分词形式做状语, 否则就不知道induce是做什么成分的.而E加and使induce和heat并列.

不知道解释的对不对?
作者: lwei1016    时间: 2004-3-12 23:58
e中的induce是和affect的并列,省略了to.


a,中的induce前面没有任何的连接词,错b,enough that 错


c,it 和displays单复不一致d,that从句错,induces无任何连接词也无修饰对象,错


作者: chasemba    时间: 2004-10-18 20:17
问一下,为什么用to比用that好.
作者: ricedog    时间: 2004-11-15 00:51
标题: [原创]

是不是形容词都这么用,be adj. + to do ,我记得有og-26中有一个be difficult to do.


作者: lemonles    时间: 2004-11-15 03:25
以下是引用chasemba在2004-10-18 20:17:00的发言:
问一下,为什么用to比用that好.


固定搭配
作者: lemonles    时间: 2004-11-15 03:28
以下是引用ricedog在2004-11-15 0:51:00的发言:

是不是形容词都这么用,be adj. + to do ,我记得有og-26中有一个be difficult to do.


没错


作者: billion    时间: 2005-2-13 21:40

还是不太明白为什么不选A, 是根据induce前面没有and来判断吗?但从og37中可以得出结论:并列成分可以不用and连接。此题为什么非要加一个and呢?请NN指教!


og37:


While some academicians believe that business ethics should be integrated into every business course, others say that students will take ethics seriously only if it would be taught as a separately required course.

(A) only if it would be taught as a separately required course
(B) only if it is taught as a separate, required course (B)
(C) if it is taught only as a course required separately
(D) if it was taught only as a separate and required course
(E) if it would only be taught as a required course, separately


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-2-13 21:43:55编辑过]

作者: xiao_zhutou    时间: 2005-2-14 00:27

OG47 中 and 不可省,要不然一句话里就有两个动词了。OG37是句型"y will happen if x happens"。并不是并列句型


作者: billion    时间: 2005-2-14 09:57
以下是引用aimcreate在2004-3-11 0:54:00的发言:
OG-47isplays of the aurora borealis, or"northern lights,"can heat the atmosphere over the arctic enough to affect the trajectories of ballistic missiles,induce electric currents that can cause balckouts in some areas and corrosion in north-south pipelines.
A)to affect the trajectories of ballistic missiles,induce
B)that the trajectories of ballistic missiles are affected,induce
C)that it affects the trajectories of ballistic missiles,induces
D)that the trajectories of ballistic missiles are affected and induces
E)to affect the trajectories of ballistic missiles and induce
我选择了A),为什么是E),我弄不懂这里的结构

1. displays...can heat...enough to affect, induce... (induce 与heat 并列)
2. displays...can heat...enough to affect, and induce (induce 与 heat并列)
3. displays...can heat...enough to affect and induce (induce 与 affect并列)


根据逻辑意思判断,induce应该与affect并列,选E


作者: peajack    时间: 2005-5-20 21:58
楼上的说得清楚
作者: 我爱欧洲    时间: 2005-5-24 15:09
and引导并列成分如果是词组如to do或 for doing什么时候可以省略and后的介词什么时候不能省略呢?感觉这种并列考过很多,但我还没总结。
作者: Avantasia    时间: 2005-5-24 15:42
A是Run-on,肯定错!
作者: 我爱欧洲    时间: 2005-5-25 17:00

这两天重点看了一下比较或平行对象是介词结构的题,发现省略不省略介词的都有!如这一题省略了to,而更多的题没有省略介词。为什么??


如54. Galileo was convinced that natural phenomena, as manifestations of the laws of physics, would appear the same to someone on the deck of a ship moving smoothly and uniformly through the water as a person standing on land.
(A) water as a
(B) water as to a
(C) water; just as it would to a
(D) water, as it would to the
(E) water; just as to the
答案是B,没有省略to.


又如


79. George Sand (Aurore Lucile Dupin) was one of the first European writers to consider the rural poor to be legitimate subjects for literature and portray these with sympathy and respect in her novels.




  1. to be legitimate subjects for literature and portray these
  2. should be legitimate subjects for literature: portray these


  3. as being legitimate subjects for literature an portraying them


  4. as if they were legitimate subjects for literal; and portray them


  5. legitimate subjects for literature and to portray them

答案是E也没有省略。


怎么省略介词有规律吗?


作者: 薰衣紫草    时间: 2005-5-26 08:59
http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&replyID=1034791&id=107152&skin=0
作者: 我爱欧洲    时间: 2005-5-26 21:46
很有收获,谢谢!我再到那里讨论讨论。
作者: lemonles    时间: 2005-5-27 03:45

enough to v.(affect...) and v.(induce)


考的是并列,看见出现的动宾搭配多了,就应该想想是不是要考并列了。


愚见!


作者: titatita    时间: 2006-1-8 16:32
以下是引用billion在2005-2-14 9:57:00的发言:


1. displays...can heat...enough to affect, induce... (induce 与heat 并列)
2. displays...can heat...enough to affect, and induce (induce 与 heat并列)
3. displays...can heat...enough to affect and induce (induce 与 affect并列)


根据逻辑意思判断,induce应该与affect并列,选E


b选项中,og说B produces an illogical and ungrammatical statement by making induce parallel with the verb heat rather than with the appropriate form of the verb affect;


为什么在,的后面用动词原型就是与heat平行?


逗号可以表并列?类似于separate,required course 就是og37的那题?



作者: gavinzhyh    时间: 2006-1-8 18:53

Displays ... can heat...enough to X and Y


enough to是表结果的集中用法之一,如so...that, such...that, so as to, enough to,我记得LZM提到enough to表达的是一种主观,so as to用于简单的系表结构


不知道清楚否?


作者: latuan1982    时间: 2006-11-23 22:15
想问一下, 为什么要表达(induce与here)并列要写成:
displays...can heat ...enough to affect, and induce?

是不是因为如果不加逗号会产生歧义??
但是有的时候不是需要通过逻辑意思来判断吗?

不懂。。。请大牛讲讲。。。

作者: windjoy    时间: 2007-4-18 23:52

请教一下……OG解释说to在这里作介词 可是为什么介词之后还用动词原型affect和induce呢?


作者: wangyi217    时间: 2008-11-25 21:35

顶~

同问,induce为什么不是和heat平行??


作者: piaolf123    时间: 2008-11-27 00:16
以下是引用wangyi217在2008-11-25 21:35:00的发言:

顶~

同问,induce为什么不是和heat平行??

根据逻辑意思判断,induce应该与affect并列






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3