ChaseDream

标题: [讨论]请大家看看这道令人头晕的大全题808 [打印本页]

作者: summergal 时间: 2009-9-12 09:28
标题: [讨论]请大家看看这道令人头晕的大全题808
The proposed health care bill would increase government regulation of health insurance, establish standards that would guarantee wider access to people with past health problems and to workers changing jobs who otherwise could be uncovered for months.

(A) establish standards that would guarantee wider access to people with past health problems and to workers changing jobs who

(B) establishing standards that would guarantee wider access to people with past health problems and to workers who are changing jobs and

(C) to establish standards that would guarantee wider access to people with past health problems and to workers who change jobs that

(D) for establishing standards that would guarantee wider access for people with past health problems and workers changing jobs who（B）

(E) for the establishment of standards that would guarantee wider access for people with past health problems and workers who are changing jobs that

我的问题是,establish是前面分句引起的结果，那么D错的原因是不是因为句子里的两个for都错了- 第一个for无论是表原因还是表目的逻辑上都错；第二个access for people搭配不当？

B里的and otherwise是不是修饰workers的？

多谢！

作者: lijiahui0422 时间: 2009-9-12 10:04

我觉得理解成伴随比较好,establishing由 bill发出,表目的常用不定式,for表目的后接名词多比如purpose之类

access to 固定搭配-有权使用

who are changing jobs and otherwise could be uncovered for months 整个定从修饰workers

个人理解，供参考

作者: summergal 时间: 2009-9-12 10:45

以下是引用lijiahui0422在2009/9/12 10:04:00的发言：

我觉得理解成伴随比较好,establishing由 bill发出,表目的常用不定式,for表目的后接名词多比如purpose之类

access to 固定搭配-有权使用

who are changing jobs and otherwise could be uncovered for months 整个定从修饰workers

个人理解，供参考

谢谢lijiahui0422~所以establishing在原句中表伴随，但由于for这里表目的，所以逻辑上错？

作者: lijiahui0422 时间: 2009-9-12 10:56
可以这么说，即使要表目的这里也使用不定式更好，因为后接一个动词~

作者: summergal 时间: 2009-9-12 11:52

以下是引用lijiahui0422在2009/9/12 10:56:00的发言：
可以这么说，即使要表目的这里也使用不定式更好，因为后接一个动词~

又看了一下，现在清楚了，谢谢~！

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)