不好意思,不是不想贴题号,是对应不到,此题出于GWD_Total31版本中第六卷17题,但我在XY13,TN-24包括GWD纯洁版都找不到原题,希望能和众NN讨论一下
Q17:
As a large corporation in a small country, Hachnut wants its managers to have international experience, so each year it sponsors management education abroad for its management trainees. Hachnut has found, however, that the attrition rate of graduates from this program is very high, with many of them leaving Hachnut to join competing firms soon after completing the program. Hachnut does use performance during the program as a criterion in deciding among candidates for management positions, but both this function and the goal of providing international experience could be achieved in other ways. Therefore, if the attrition problem cannot be successfully addressed, Hachnut should discontinue the sponsorship program.
In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
我选的是D,答案是E。我觉得第一句黑体就是policy本身,是argument要评价的;是不是说第二句不是grounds是evidence?
我觉得很难分辨,解题的切入点到底在哪里?
这类题我的方法是,不在句子意思上过分纠结,重点看黑体逻辑关系,还有黑体到底是个什么(理论建议,实际措施,猜测假设...)。
黑体1:通过大概意思看出,是一个措施手段, 而非policy。文中的真正的policy是“Hachnut wants its managers to have international experience”。(policy是一种目的性质的东西,没有替换的可能性。而手段措施是可能有很多种选择的。)
黑体2:是讲其他措施也能达到同样目的。因为你认为 黑体1是policy,所以,你看D的second 解释也是对的。如果搞清楚什么是policy,什么是实际措施手段,就好办了。
BTW
本来想自己先做这题,看能否做对,结果你把E给放大了,摆明了是正确选项。哎,多少干扰了我的做题思路。
这题答案是D啊。。。。
我查了一下我下载的GWD_Total31版本中第六卷17题,答案确实是D啊。
我也困惑了。总之,abc肯定是错了。就剩下DE了。
仔细看E:... the policy should be abandoned. 文中结论是:if...Hachnut should discontinue the sponsorship program. 这样看,就是说policy=sponsorship program。然而,黑体1就是“sponsorship program”这个内容!所以,E本身前后矛盾。
对于policy的理解,我不太清楚了,困惑。
谢谢NN们,我发现确实答案是D,我怎么犯这种低级错误,真是对不住,版本太多了,都晕了!
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |