ChaseDream

标题: [求助]急~拜托大家了-帮忙分析大全650的with问题 [打印本页]

作者: summergal    时间: 2009-9-9 19:09
标题: [求助]急~拜托大家了-帮忙分析大全650的with问题

1. Since savings banks have to use short-term deposits to finance long-term fixed-rate mortgage loans, they sometimes lose money when there is a rise in short-term rates and, on the other hand, they are unable to raise the rates on their mortgages.

(A) when there is a rise in short-term rates and, on the other hand, they are unable to raise

(B) when short-term rates rise and they are unable to raise

(C) when a rise in short-term rates occurs and, correspondingly, there is no rise possible in

(D) with a rise in short-term rates, and they are unable to raiseB

(E) with short-term rates on the rise and no rise possible in

想不通为什么E不对,如果要说E结构不平行的话,那么B也不平行啊...

大家帮忙看看,谢谢!


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/9/9 20:13:44编辑过]

作者: summergal    时间: 2009-9-9 20:12
顶...
作者: summergal    时间: 2009-9-9 20:50
顶顶顶,为什么没人帮忙呵...5555555...
作者: aeoluseros    时间: 2009-9-10 00:03

E里面with短语可能修饰money。而且E选项可以看做and后面省略了with: with short-term rates on the rise and (with) no rise possible in the rates on their mortgages; 可以发现short-term rates和the rates on their mortgages并不平行。

B里面short-term rates rise and they are unable to raise,short term rates rise和they are unable to raise平行的。


作者: summergal    时间: 2009-9-10 10:11

谢谢aeoluseros NN(居然等到斑斑回答我的问题,泪~),不过我分析了一下B:when short-term rates rise and they are unable to raise the rates on their mortgages -这前后两个rates一个是主语,一个是raise的宾语,按成分看的话,也还是不平行的呀...

是不是用排除法 - E的with有修饰歧义,错误更加严重?


作者: aeoluseros    时间: 2009-9-11 09:39

momo..不是NN,一起探讨哈
E里面确切讲是具体名词short-term rates与抽象名词rise possible是不能并列的,因为概念上不对等.也算是个大错吧.
而B里面,and两边都是主谓(宾)结构,是可以平行的。


作者: summergal    时间: 2009-9-12 06:22
明白了,大谢aeoluseros 斑斑~!!!




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3