According to public health officials, in 1998
这道题答案是A, 为什么不能是C呢?
我觉得划线部分应该是than babies were born to women,不知道对不对,请NN指点,万分感谢
本人语法很烂,不过说说我的看法,大家讨论一下。
我觉得A对的,补全省略的部分应该是:than women under the age of thirty.
this book means more to me than you.
你觉得上面这个对么?应该是than to you 比较好吧。所以你要选C,就至少应该是than to XXXXXXX。
而且选C后面是她们小于30,more 后面是大于30的妇女生孩子。这两个也不是对称结构啊。
一般只有在比较主语时才需要补出助动词,拿楼上那个例子说好了
this book means more to me than you.
this book means more to me than that book does.
要知道补出助动词的目的是为了防止歧义,第二句话如果不补助动词就有歧义了
这里不能加THEY,加了就指代不清了,我觉得这里是30岁以上的女人和30岁以下的女人相比较
显然,是想比较宾语的,是women的怎样怎样...,也就是(这么说就有点不负责任了)women的宾语 women over the age of thirty than under it. -----women that is over thirty than under thirty 我的想法源于,比较的庖丁解牛。这个是比较的宾语,虽然庖丁解牛里没有谈到,但是我觉得似乎可以这样应用吧 如有更简单的或者是不对的地方,希望大家指正 附:比较的庖丁解牛---应该有些启发。加油! http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=103101&replyID=&skin=0
显然,是想比较宾语的,是women的怎样怎样...,也就是(这么说就有点不负责任了)women的宾语
women over the age of thirty than under it. -----women that is over thirty than under thirty
我的想法源于,比较的庖丁解牛。这个是比较的宾语,虽然庖丁解牛里没有谈到,但是我觉得似乎可以这样应用吧
如有更简单的或者是不对的地方,希望大家指正
附:比较的庖丁解牛---应该有些启发。加油!
http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=103101&replyID=&skin=0
显然,是想比较宾语的,是women的怎样怎样...,也就是(这么说就有点不负责任了)women的宾语 women over the age of thirty than under it. -----women that is over thirty than under thirty 我的想法源于,比较的庖丁解牛。这个是比较的宾语,虽然庖丁解牛里没有谈到,但是我觉得似乎可以这样应用吧 如有更简单的或者是不对的地方,希望大家指正 附:比较的庖丁解牛---应该有些启发。加油! http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=103101&replyID=&skin=0
显然,是想比较宾语的,是women的怎样怎样...,也就是(这么说就有点不负责任了)women的宾语
women over the age of thirty than under it. -----women that is over thirty than under thirty
我的想法源于,比较的庖丁解牛。这个是比较的宾语,虽然庖丁解牛里没有谈到,但是我觉得似乎可以这样应用吧
如有更简单的或者是不对的地方,希望大家指正
附:比较的庖丁解牛---应该有些启发。加油!
http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=103101&replyID=&skin=0
发表些意见,
虽然我一开始也是选的C, 不过根据PREP的解释,代词要遵循就近指代的原则,所以
than they were 是 than wowen were 的代替,意思显然不对。
不过A 选项more babies were born to women over the age of thirty than under it. 我也觉得不妥,
如果改成 more babies were born to women over the age of thirty than THOSE under it. 可能更好点,
愚钝之见,大家一起学习啊,最近被语法这一块弄的焦头烂额.
我觉得要比较的是孩子啊。
30岁以上妇女生的孩子比30岁以下的妇女生的孩子多。
more babies were born to women over the age of thirty than THOSE under it.
这句话中 THOSE under it 是什么?
妇女 under 30 ?比较对象不对
孩子 under 30? 逻辑不对
为什么LZ要选择C,如果是than they were岂不是和babies were比较,即便不是和babies were比较,则只能是和wowen were比较,显然不对,本题不管从逻辑还是本意来说都是和women over the age of thirty比较啊!
不知道是我想简单了,还是LZ想的复杂了。
我觉得要比较的是孩子啊。
30岁以上妇女生的孩子比30岁以下的妇女生的孩子多。
more babies were born to women over the age of thirty than THOSE under it.
这句话中 THOSE under it 是什么?
妇女 under 30 ?比较对象不对
孩子 under 30? 逻辑不对
我现在想到一点为什么c不对了。我觉得本题比较的主体还是babies,但问题的关键是不能用they指代。因为比较的应该是同一类而不是同一物。如果用they的话,就表示的是前面的babies were born to women over the age of thirty。本题要么应该用those指代babies,要么就全部省略。
不知道我讲得对不对,请大家指教。
意思比较的是妇女吧
in which more babies were born to women over the age of thirty than(to women) under it.
结构和前面一模一样,所以是省略了to women,C肯定错啊,C比较的是孩子
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |