ChaseDream
标题: [求助]GWD7-Q13 like的用法 这里怎么也看不懂 [打印本页]
作者: amei88 时间: 2009-9-1 10:07
标题: [求助]GWD7-Q13 like的用法 这里怎么也看不懂
GWD7-Q13:
Like the grassy fields and old pastures that the upland sandpiper needs for feeding and nesting when it returns in May after wintering in the Argentine Pampas, the sandpipers vanishing in the northeastern United States is a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in farming practices.
A. the sandpipers vanishing in the northeastern United States is a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in
B. the bird itself is vanishing in the northeastern United States as a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in
C. that the birds themselves are vanishing in the northeastern United States is due to residential and industrial development and changes to
D. in the northeastern United States, sandpipers’ vanishing is due to residential and industrial development and to changes in
E. in the northeastern United States, the sandpipers’ vanishing, a result of residential and industrial development and changing
正确答案是B
完全不知所以。
前面是like field,后面为什么可以用the bird当主语呢???
作者: myloveavril 时间: 2009-9-1 10:18
这题我觉得应该从逻辑意思上判断吧,like还是表示比较。grassy fields and old pastures are vanishing the bird is vanishing. 答案还是比较出来的,其它几项都有明显错误
作者: overthere33 时间: 2009-9-1 11:47
都是生物嘛
作者: amei88 时间: 2009-9-1 12:10
以下是引用overthere33在2009/9/1 11:47:00的发言:
都是生物嘛
一个是地,一个是鸟,怎么会都是生物呢?
还是我对于题目的意思理解错误?
作者: payo 时间: 2009-9-1 13:03
类比
作者: yinan 时间: 2009-9-1 14:09
以下是引用myloveavril在2009/9/1 10:18:00的发言:
这题我觉得应该从逻辑意思上判断吧,like还是表示比较。grassy fields and old pastures are vanishing the bird is vanishing. 答案还是比较出来的,其它几项都有明显错误
强烈同意
作者: ritarever 时间: 2009-9-1 14:28
我是这么理解的:就像这个鸟(sandpiper)所栖息的地方(grassy fields and old pastures)一样,这种鸟本身也vanish了~ 就是说两个(鸟和地方)都没了,但这句话主要是说鸟
作者: amei88 时间: 2009-9-1 19:04
哦~~~原来是这样~~~多谢大家了
作者: serior 时间: 2009-9-1 21:31
Like the grassy fields and old pastures that the upland sandpiper needs for feeding and nesting when it returns in May after wintering in the Argentine Pampas 这句话是倒装吧,正序:
Like the upland sandpiper needs the grassy fields and old pastures for feeding and nesting when it returns in May after wintering in the Argentine Pampas
sandpiper 和 brid就能类比了。
逻辑理解真重要~~,哎。
作者: 赋格 时间: 2009-10-26 19:12
以下是引用serior在2009/9/1 21:31:00的发言:Like the grassy fields and old pastures that the upland sandpiper needs for feeding and nesting when it returns in May after wintering in the Argentine Pampas 这句话是倒装吧,正序:
Like the upland sandpiper needs the grassy fields and old pastures for feeding and nesting when it returns in May after wintering in the Argentine Pampas
sandpiper 和 brid就能类比了。
逻辑理解真重要~~,哎。
明白了,谢谢
作者: Hingis 时间: 2009-12-30 22:38
不是倒装吧..like+n正确,可是like+n+do就不对了吧...白勇语法上有说哦.....
就是草地和小鸟对比,句子是想表达小鸟和草地一样,因为residential and industrial development and of changes in farming practices消失了,逻辑上来说没有问题
作者: waytodream 时间: 2010-1-3 19:46
不是倒装。就是说 像 the upland sandpiper 需要的grassy fields and old pastures 一样,这个小鸟(B项中的the bird itself 就是指 the upland sandpiper) 也vanish了。地和鸟都没了。不是拿the upland sandpiper和bird类比,因为他们是一个东东。
作者: lolmandy 时间: 2010-1-3 19:55
这题我觉得应该从逻辑意思上判断吧,like还是表示比较。
grassy fields and old pastures are vanishing the bird is vanishing. 答案还是比较出来的,其它几项都有明显错误-- by 会员 myloveavril (2009/9/1 10:18:00)
sou desu ne~~
作者: Behind 时间: 2010-1-23 16:06
同意6楼的,这应该不是倒装,是比较两种东西vanish 的原因
作者: jbc88 时间: 2010-11-2 21:23
啊。。那要是不知道sandpiper是种鸟。。岂不惨了?
作者: 小m月饼 时间: 2011-8-5 16:34
A怎么排除的?
作者: Icebringer 时间: 2012-5-1 17:17
其实默默的看到了when it,就知道后面一定要有个飞的东西,就果断点B啦~
作者: kid381 时间: 2013-6-21 17:06
serior 发表于 2009-9-1 21:31
Like the grassy fields and old pastures that the upland sandpiper needs for feeding and nesting when ...
似乎不是倒装吧,like后怎么能加从句呢,还是从逻辑含义上着手比较对,grassy fields和sandpiper都是vanish的事物,所以句意上平行。个人的一点浅见,请指正。
作者: why1993 时间: 2013-9-3 23:12
A 是 is a result of B 是 as a result of
作者: 胖胖豌豆鱼公主 时间: 2014-8-3 21:08
强烈同意6楼的“我是这么理解的:就像这个鸟(sandpiper)所栖息的地方(grassy fields and old pastures)一样,这种鸟本身也vanish了~ 就是说两个(鸟和地方)都没了,但这句话主要是说鸟”,一语点醒!!!
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |