ChaseDream

标题: 求助GWD17-21 [打印本页]

作者: 海鸟 时间: 2009-8-28 22:38
标题: 求助GWD17-21

Medicare, the United States government’s health insurance program for the elderly and disabled, covers the full cost of home health care, but not with other nonhospital services where 20 percent of the costs must be paid by beneficiaries.

A. but not with other nonhospital services where 20 percent of the costs must be paid by beneficiaries

B. but not of other nonhospital services,
making beneficiaries pay 20 percent of the costs

C. but not of other nonhospital services, for which beneficiaries must pay 20 percent of the costs

D. which is unlike other nonhospital services in that 20 percent of the costs must be paid by beneficiaries

E. which is unlike other nonhospital services that make beneficiaries pay 20 percent of the costs

答案C

我选的B

C的making 为什么不对呢

作者: 哈宁 时间: 2009-8-28 23:30

MAKING做状语???

期待高人指点.虽然我确实觉得C好一点.

作者: 海鸟 时间: 2009-8-29 10:43
自己顶

作者: lijiahui0422 时间: 2009-8-29 10:52

你是想说making做结果状语，表达前面的事情引起的结果吧

但是（1）make sth do 在这里不对,只见过make sth done/adj和make sth sth

（2）b中的must没有了，情态动词不去要轻易删掉

（3）for which 表达的意思比表结果状语更明显，能表现出service和 beneficiaries的关系

作者: 海鸟 时间: 2009-8-29 22:15

你是想说making做结果状语，表达前面的事情引起的结果吧

但是（1）make sth do 在这里不对,只见过make sth done/adj和make sth sth

（2）b中的must没有了，情态动词不去要轻易删掉

（3）for which 表达的意思比表结果状语更明显，能表现出service和 beneficiaries的关系

首先同意第二点，我真的忽略了

但（1）我不甚同意

句中是 make beneficiaries pay是make sb do sth的结构，是有这种用法的

意思上我觉得是前面cover the full of but not of...使得beneficiaries pay 20% 这样理解说的过去啊

快来人拍醒我吧

作者: lijiahui0422 时间: 2009-8-30 08:06

有道理...make sb do是可以

我又想了下，这个making既可以理解成表结果的伴随状语其实是有歧义的，因为可以发出making这个动作的service 和medcare都可以。

所以这个making到底是他们两个其中之一发出的，还是由这个事件引起的不清楚

作者: 海鸟 时间: 2009-8-30 16:51

好像是这么回事

谢谢

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)