ChaseDream

标题: GWD28-Q25 to Q26 拜托帮我看一下!快考了! [打印本页]

作者: zliycwn1    时间: 2009-8-27 16:11
标题: GWD28-Q25 to Q26 拜托帮我看一下!快考了!

虽然阅读版人少,不过真的没人可以讨论了

GWD28-Q25 to Q26:

      Many politicians, business leaders, and scholars discount the role of public policy and emphasize the role of the labor market when explaining employers’ maternity-leave policies, arguing that prior to the passage of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) of 1993, employers were already providing maternity leave in response to the increase in the number of women workers.  Employers did create maternity-leave programs in the 1970’s and 1980’s, but not as a purely voluntary response in the absence of any government mandate. In 1972, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) ruled that employers who allowed leaves for disabling medical conditions must also allow them for maternity and that failure to do so would constitute sex discrimination under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  As early as 1973, a survey found that 58 percent of large employers had responded with new maternity-leave policies.  Because the 1972 EEOC ruling was contested in court, the ruling won press attention that popularized maternity-leave policies.  Yet perhaps because the Supreme Court later struck down the ruling, politicians and scholars have failed to recognize its effects, assuming that employers adopted maternity-leave policies in response to the growing feminization of the workforce.


    

Q25
The passage is primarily concerned with
A.reporting an author’s view of a phenomenon
B.disputing the reasons usually given for an
        
unexpected change
C.evaluating the conclusions reached by an
        
author
D.assessing the impact of certain legal
        
decisions.
E.defending a controversial point of view
        
我排除了ABC 答案在DE间徘徊的 选了D
但答案是C
非常不理解 全文如果有author,只有写文章即作者本人的观点了
其一,一个人怎么evaluate自己的观点?
其二,我觉得通篇是在讲作者如何表述自己的观点,并没有出现evaluate(分好坏)啊

作者: salad1989    时间: 2009-8-29 20:21

GWD28-Q25 to Q26:

      Many politicians, business leaders, and scholars discount the role of public policy and emphasize the role of the labor market when explaining employers’ maternity-leave policies, arguing that prior to the passage of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) of 1993, employers were already providing maternity leave in response to the increase in the number of women workers.  Employers did create maternity-leave programs in the 1970’s and 1980’s, but not as a purely voluntary response in the absence of any government mandate. In 1972, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) ruled that employers who allowed leaves for disabling medical conditions must also allow them for maternity and that failure to do so would constitute sex discrimination under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  As early as 1973, a survey found that 58 percent of large employers had responded with new maternity-leave policies.  Because the 1972 EEOC ruling was contested in court, the ruling won press attention that popularized maternity-leave policies.  Yet perhaps because the Supreme Court later struck down the ruling, politicians and scholars have failed to recognize its effects, assuming that employers adopted maternity-leave policies in response to the growing feminization of the workforce.

Q26:

The passage suggests that the relationship between the view of the author with respect to maternity leave policy prior to passage of the FMLA and the view of the politicians, business leaders, and scholars mentioned in lines 1-2 can best be characterized by which of the following statements?

A.      They agree that both the 1972 EEOC ruling on maternity-leave policy and the increasing feminization of the workplace had an impact on employers’ creation of maternity-leave programs but disagree about the relative importance of each factor.

B.       They agree that the EEOC ruling on maternity-leave policy had an initial impact on employers’ creation of maternity-leave programs but disagree over whether the Supreme Court’s striking down of the EEOC ruling weakened that impact.

C.      They agree that creating maternity-leave programs was a necessary response to the needs of the increasing number of women workers but disagree about whether maternity should be classified as a disabling medical condition.

D.      They agree that employers created maternity-leave programs prior to passage of the FMLA but disagree about employers’ motivations for doing so.

E.       They agree that employers created maternity-leave programs prior to passage of the FMLA but disagree about how widespread those programs were.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

我觉得lz的字体有些小。。嘿嘿

这篇阅读很奇怪,读懂了,却做不对题。。而且都不明白。sigh

26题我选了A,但答案却是D

希望有nn可以指教一下!





 


作者: zliycwn1    时间: 2009-8-29 21:49
 Employers did create maternity-leave programs in the 1970’s and 1980’s, but not as a purely voluntary response in the absence of any government mandate

这句是关键,这句以后文章都在说employers是怎么被动地承认接受的,虽然他们arguing prior to the passage of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) of 1993, employers were already providing maternity leave

increasing feminization of the workplace 作者是没有给出相关的态度的 因此不对


作者: DarkRusher    时间: 2009-8-30 14:01
25题中说的是an author而不是the author,也就是说那是一个不知名人士的观点而不是作者本人的……
作者开头说了三类人的共同观点,第二句来了个but开始唱反调,所以是evaluate这个观点到底对不对……
文章评价的是观点,而不是法律条文的影响。法律条文只是观点中的一个细节,所以D选项是不合适的……
至于E选项,个人认为作者不是在捍卫观点而是在反驳……

作者: zliycwn1    时间: 2009-8-30 19:25

Many politicians, business leaders, and scholars discount the role of public policy ...

可这些都不是author啊,一般是这样的选项必然有前面一个谁的一本书或者一个学者怎样,我不选C就是因为politicians, leaders, scholars作者这样general的举例意在说明这些都是普遍的观点

当然D我也不觉得特别好...


作者: kevinli120    时间: 2009-9-2 14:40

Q25  C

It can be inferred that the author of the passage would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements about government policy?

A.    Government policy is generally unaffected by pressures in the labor market.

B.    The impact of a given government policy is generally weakened by sustained press attention.

C.    It is possible for a particular government policy to continue to have an impact after that policy has been eliminated.

D.    A given government policy can be counterproductive when that policy has already unofficially been implemented.

E.     The impact of a given government policy is generally weakened when the ruling is contested in court.

 答案选C,我选E,不明白啊,求助


作者: xinling917    时间: 2009-9-9 22:17
文章读明白了就是做不对题!!NN们能否帮解决一下这个问题!是文章读的不够细,还是没理解清逻辑关系?????郁闷!
作者: amumu    时间: 2009-9-9 23:49

逻辑:

PBLS认为:女工人数量增长
                    -> ML
政策实施


    Author认为:EEOC被否决,但是影响大 -> ML政策实施

Q25:我认为选A。
因为看遍BCDE都是说government policy实施以后的事情,而原文中根本都没有讨论过government policy实施以后(即1993年以后)的事情。
倒是从最高法院否决EEOC的请求看出,即使EEOC造成了很大的影响,但是government和民间诉求不相关。
P.S:另外,也可以看看大家如何理解government policy?EEOC的那个算吗?如果算的话,那确实被否决之后还有影响,就选C了。

Q26:
关键原文:
Yet perhaps because the Supreme Court later struck
down the ruling, politicians and scholars have failed to recognize its effects,
assuming that employers adopted maternity-leave policies in response to the
growing feminization of the workforce
.

表明作者和那帮人都认同实际ML政策在93年之前就实施了,但是一个认为是EEOC的影响,另一帮人认为是女工增加导致的。

作者: amumu    时间: 2009-9-9 23:57
刚刚又仔细想了一下,EEOC的政策就是government policy,见原文:
 As early as 1973, a survey found that 58
percent of large employers had responded with new maternity-leave policies.

另外,EEOC是美国联邦政府的一个机构,当然它的主张可以成为government policy。见Wiki:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Employment_Opportunity_Commission

作者: sunny0625    时间: 2009-9-10 23:05
Yet perhaps because the Supreme Court later struck down the ruling, politicians and scholars have failed to recognize its effects, assuming that employers adopted maternity-leave policies in response to the growing feminization of the workforce.
回答kevinli120
struck down the ruling 对应policy has been eliminated.   就是说虽然法律被eliminate 了但由于媒体的关注employer采取了materity-leave policies
所以选C

作者: serendipityh    时间: 2009-9-16 21:00
晕!!原来是这么翻译! 还是不懂!!
我怎么感觉GWD阅读比OG难多了!! 哎~~~~~~~~~
[此贴子已经被作者于2009/9/16 21:02:08编辑过]

作者: TonyGe    时间: 2009-9-20 17:49

就是评估(驳斥)第一句中的那些人的观点(an author)

C 是 right


作者: ozymendias    时间: 2010-8-13 21:09
Yet perhaps because the Supreme Court later struck down the ruling, politicians and scholars have failed to recognize its effects, assuming that employers adopted maternity-leave policies in response to the growing feminization of the workforce.回答kevinli120struck down the ruling 对应policy has been eliminated.   就是说虽然法律被eliminate 了但由于媒体的关注employer采取了materity-leave policies所以选C
-- by 会员 sunny0625 (2009/9/10 23:05:00)


个人觉得还应该一起看前面一句:
Because the 1972 EEOC ruling was contested in court, the ruling won press attention that popularized maternity-leave policies。
虽然这个ruling受到了争议,但仍然对press有很大影响
Yet perhaps because the Supreme Court later struck down the ruling, politicians and scholars have failed to recognize its effects, assuming that 。。。
然而也许因为这个ruling被eliminated,politicians和scholars 错误地将其影响假定为是。。。
作者的言下之意就是这个ruling虽然被灭了,但是还是很有影响的,只不过政治家和学者将其认为是其他的。。。
一个failed就体现了作者的态度
所以C正确

作者: shuaihere    时间: 2010-10-11 14:16
文章大意:1972年的EEOC规定颁布之后,许多employer提出了新的产假政(maternity-leave policies)。government以为employer的这种行为是由于劳动力女性化(growing feminization of the workforce)所导致,但本文作者认为是1972 EEOC ruling was contested in court所引发的the ruling won press attention that popularized maternity-leave policies导致employer提出了新的产假政策。
作者: quill    时间: 2010-12-20 18:17
Employers did create maternity-leave programs in the 1970’s and 1980’s, but not as a purely voluntary response in the absence of any government mandate这句是关键,这句以后文章都在说employers是怎么被动地承认接受的,虽然他们arguing prior to the passage of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) of 1993, employers were already providing maternity leave
increasing feminization of the workplace 作者是没有给出相关的态度的 因此不对
-- by 会员 zliycwn1 (2009/8/29 21:49:00)


赞~~~
作者: tubai    时间: 2011-8-26 23:38
文章开始:Many politicians, business leaders, and scholars discount the role of public policy and emphasize the role of the labor market when explaining employers’ maternity-leave policies 感觉就是说26题中A啊。就是他们认为这两个因素的比重不同啊??
作者: Margarete7    时间: 2013-5-7 22:35
Q26

In 1972, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) ruled that employers who allowed leaves for disabling medical conditions must also allow them for maternity and that failure to do so would constitute sex discrimination under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  As early as 1973, a survey found that 58 percent of large employers had responded with new maternity-leave policies.

Because the 1972 EEOC ruling was contested in court, the ruling won press attention that popularized maternity-leave policies.  Yet perhaps because the Supreme Court later struck dow(废除) the ruling, politicians and scholars have failed to recognize its effects, assuming that employers adopted maternity-leave policies in response to the growing feminization of the workforce.
选D
加粗字体——作者认为employer这么做是因为EEOC的rule,而政客学者因为最高法院废除了这个rule就fail to认识到这个rule的作用而认为是工作场所女性职员的增加而促使employer实行产假制度




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3