ChaseDream

标题: 大全537 [打印本页]

作者: viviansecret    时间: 2009-8-19 01:16
标题: 大全537

537.        Not all employment selection mechanisms that have a “disparate effect,” that is, that screens out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate to their presence in the relevant labor market, are unlawful.

(A) that is, that screens out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate to

(B) which means, that screens out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate with

(C) which means, that screen out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate with

(D) that is, that screen out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate to

(E) that is, that screens out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate with

答案:D。我刚查了之前的帖子,说这里面screen前面的that是指带mechanisms。我的问题是,如何判断这个that指带的是mechanisms还是“disparate effect”呢?有什么判断方法吗?请多多指教!


作者: joymoon    时间: 2009-8-19 01:53

that is 在这里有and的作用

逻辑上判断 显然不能说分离的结果是刷选.......这个动作过程

选择机制有刷选...这个动作导致有分离的结果

纯属个人愚见


作者: viviansecret    时间: 2009-8-19 02:29
恩,对的,谢谢joymoon指教:)




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3