ChaseDream

标题: GWD26-Q20与pp-2-08中时态选择的矛盾求教 [打印本页]

作者: guoyun622    时间: 2009-8-18 15:49
标题: GWD26-Q20与pp-2-08中时态选择的矛盾求教

 GWD26-Q20

In 1981 children in the United States spent an average
        
of slightly less than two and a half hours a week doing
        
household chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hours a week.

A.      chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hours
        
a week

B.       chores; by 1997 that figure had grown to nearly
        
six hours a week

C.      chores, whereas nearly six hours a week were
        
spent in 1997

D.      chores, compared with a figure of nearly six hours a week in 1997

E.       chores, that figure growing to nearly six hours a week in 1997

这一题选B,当时大家的讨论结果是,分号隔开的两个句子时态无逻辑关系.但是下面PREP的这题选D明显的表明分号前后句子间时态有关系啊..请教能想通的同志们.谢谢谢谢请大家都来讨论~

8.    (24773-!-item-!-188;#058&001691)

 

Ozone, a special form of oxygen that screens out harmful ultraviolet rays, reaches high concentrations twelve miles above Earth, where it has long appeared that it was immune from human influence; we have now realized, though, that emissions of industrial chlorofluorocarbons deplete the ozone layer.

 

(A) has long appeared that it was immune from

(B) has long appeared to have been immune from

(C) has long appeared as being immune to

(D) had long appeared immune to

(E) had long appeared that it was immune to


作者: guoyun622    时间: 2009-8-18 16:09
顶~
作者: guoyun622    时间: 2009-8-18 17:24
再顶~
作者: sue12    时间: 2009-8-18 18:23

我是按意思去理解后面道题的

we have now realized, though, that emissions of industrial chlorofluorocarbons deplete the ozone layer. 是对前面意思的一个转折,讲我们现在发现了那个emission of industrial chlorofluorocarbons 还是对ozon layer 有损耗。

再看前面,明显就是跟后面意思是相反的,而这个是以前的理解。  现在的看法用的是 we have前面用had 就是对的。 

再说where后面的 it:   D 选项的it 指代的是ozone layer 而E中指代的是后面的从句 ,所以综上应该选D。

第一个句子我的理解是由于有by 1997, 而1997 已经过了,这是个很明显的过去完成时标志,再加上本身比较的是figure, 所以就选B了。

个人意见仅供参考,  我也是正在挣扎着的。。。

 

 


作者: guoyun622    时间: 2009-8-18 20:44
再顶~大家一起讨论一下啊...这个问题很纠结..
作者: guoyun622    时间: 2009-8-18 21:59
DDDD....
作者: guoyun622    时间: 2009-8-19 11:31
再顶..请大家有想法的都来说说好吗..
作者: guoyun622    时间: 2009-8-19 13:49
嘿...我不放弃...
作者: guoyun622    时间: 2009-8-19 17:50

再顶...希望有人来


作者: guoyun622    时间: 2009-8-19 20:49
顶上..
作者: jingjing6688    时间: 2009-9-1 23:29
我觉得两道题还是有点不一样的,Q20有时间状语,by 1997,引用一个前辈对此题的解释:

by 1997 that figure had grown to nearly
        
six hours a week,是可以这样用过去完成时的,因为前面有by 1997,也就是强调对1997年过去时点的一个影响

而第8题没有这样的时间状语,而且有个对比的意思,had long appeared 中注意那个long,再根据后面已经用到了we have now realized,所以用过去完成时,其实这道题用别的知识点已经能排除错误答案了,遇到这种不明显的时态错误最好还是避开,不是NN,一点个人看法。欢迎拍砖!
作者: wellwell723    时间: 2009-9-1 23:57

1.前半句是IN 1981孩子花了多少时间(特殊时间点,过去时)

分号后是By 1997数字增长了多少(过去完成时)

1997相对现在已经是过去了,那1997之前就是过去的过去了。

没有矛盾。

2.分号前:客观情况现在时,从句现在完成时-表明到现在为止的影响

分号后:我们现在已经意识到了另个事实,现在完成时也么问题。


作者: bonniexiong    时间: 2009-9-2 13:07
compared with 修饰谁的不明确。按理应该修饰children,不符合逻辑




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3