The three women, liberal activists who strongly support legislation in favor of civil rights and environmental protection, have consistently received labor's unqualifying support.
a,原题
b, are consistently receiving the unqualifying support of labor
c, have consistently received the unqualifying support of labor
d, receive consistent and unqualified support by labor
e, are receiving consistent and unqualified support by labor
答案是c但不知道为什么,求教牛人。。。
A C 的区别仅在于 labor's unqualifying support 和 unqualifying support of labor
为什么选C呢?两者有什么区别?
同意楼上几位说的,可是d错在哪儿?
语法题"有仇报仇" 所以选C不是D
大家都是往答案上凑吧。这句话跟本看不出该用现在什么时态,只要没有用过去或者将来都说得通,consistently单用现在进行更多,当然经常是跟SINCE连用。consistent 是褒义词,unqualifying贬意义词,用AND连接不好,改成副词无褒贬。明天去请教一下美国同事。
顺便问另两道讨厌的题:
In an attempt to guarantee the security of its innovative water purification method, the company required each employee to sign a confidentially agreement prohibiting that its water purification methods be disclosed to companies using an analogous purification process.
a原题
b prohibiting them from the disclosing of its water purification methods to any company
c prohibiting disclosure of its water purification methods to any company
d that would prohibit them from disclosure of its water purification methods to companies
e that would prohibit its water purification methods to be disclosed to a company
为什么选c? a 错在哪里? c 的disclosure前面是不是该加the?
The investigation of many psychologists and anthropologists support the generalization of there being little that is a significant difference in the underlying mental processes manifested by people from different cultures.
a 原题
b of there being little that is significantly different
c of little that is significantly different
d that there is little that is significantly different
e that there is little of significant differences
为什么是d?有这样的表达方式?
首先回答原来的题目:关于前者说的:无生命与有生命用法,从OG上看,我从没遇到过,官方给出这解释,所以我觉得不能随意总结,并且题目中的labor是有生命的,我的看法:从OG表达更清楚角度来看,修饰对象应该尽可能靠近,所以labor放在后面为好.
后面的两个题目:A错在后面的companies,你看下公司后面的定语就知道该用a company.其实这题目我到感觉,ing做定语应该改为that从句,因为从句后面的内容对整句是重要的,我到有个疑问:prohibit that 有这用法?
第二题,ABC明显错,而E你看下,这里little of 是修饰significant的,所以明显错了,D这用法到是没怎么看到过,但是没明显错误啊
个人卓见
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |