ChaseDream

标题: prep1-150 [打印本页]

---

作者: sunny8843    时间: 2009-8-6 13:17
标题: prep1-150

150.
            (33009-!-item-!-188;#058&006530)
The computer company has announced that it will
purchase the color-printing division of a rival company for $950 million,
which is part of a deal that will make it the largest manufacturer in the
office color-printing market.

    

(A) million, which is part of a deal that will
make

    

(B) million, a part of a deal that makes

    

(C) million, part of a deal making

    

(D) million as a part of a deal to make

    

(E) million as part of a deal that will make

笔记上说BC中(a) part of a deal不可以做million的同位语，（暂且忽略后面make的时态这个考点）

但是同位语在很多时候不是都是概括性同位语指代前面整件事情么？

看了好几遍都不知道为什么，体会不出来，请NN指教啊～

[此贴子已经被作者于2009/8/6 13:17:45编辑过]

---

作者: lijiahui0422    时间: 2009-8-6 15:50

感觉同位语没什么问题...prep解释的有点牵强，还是从时态区分吧

---

作者: sunny8843    时间: 2009-8-7 20:12
顶下

---

作者: mikecello    时间: 2009-8-7 20:22
这边还真没看出a part 和 part 有什么不同。我觉得判断的关键还就在于making和定从修饰a deal吧

---

作者: gracezz    时间: 2009-9-24 22:28
请问同位语也是就近原则吗?如果这样的话part of 和a part of 都是在说million.这样就不和逻辑了....prep的说法就是正确的了

---

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)

Powered by Discuz! X3.3