ChaseDream
标题: T-4-Q39 nn请解释A选项的错误 [打印本页]
作者: caopp 时间: 2009-7-27 06:29
标题: T-4-Q39 nn请解释A选项的错误
Five hundred million different species of living creatures have appeared on Earth, nearly 99 percent of them vanishing.
- Five hundred million different species of living creatures have appeared on Earth, nearly 99 percent of them vanishing.
- Nearly 99 percent of five hundred million different species of living creatures that appeared on Earth have vanished.
- Vanished are nearly 99percent of the five hundred million different species of living creatures that appeared on Earth.
- Of five hundred million different species of living creatures that have appeared on Earth, nearly 99 percent of them have vanished.
- Of the five hundred million different species of living creatures that have appeared on Earth, nearly 99 percent have vanished.
答案是E, 我也同意
之前的帖子对A选项的错误集中在them指代不清。但代词可以指代短语,这里them可以指代Five hundred million different species of living creatures ,这样的话,nearly 99 percent of them vanishing就是标准的独立主格。NN现身解释下
作者: lijiahui0422 时间: 2009-7-27 07:53
首先句意重心变了,A重在说species 出现,而E重在说species 消失,我觉得这个是最主要的错误
them我觉得只是不太好,没觉得致命,但是以现在分词出现的独立主格有点曲解原意,vanishing?怎么说也是个vanished
作者: caopp 时间: 2009-7-28 01:20
按照二楼分析改为,nearly 99 percent of them vanished 独立主格中表被动,them应是主动vanish, 也不对啊。还是没清楚A的错误在哪
作者: mikecello 时间: 2009-7-28 01:42
vanishing表示一个延续的概念,表示一直在vanish, 而这边主要是要表达一个已经消失的概念~
作者: lijiahui0422 时间: 2009-7-29 10:02
独立主格中是不是过去分词只能表被动我不确定...不过increased sale这个你肯定见过,这个就不是表被动,另外I miss the period of middle school,a happy time gone.
这里的gone就是表完成而不是被动
当然这里改成vanished我也感觉不好,只要我们都同意vanishing表达已经发生过不好就行了~
作者: yyangao 时间: 2009-7-30 10:39
与楼主同问
作者: wen00wen 时间: 2009-8-4 09:17
up
作者: lihanljz 时间: 2009-9-15 17:27
以下是引用lijiahui0422在2009/7/27 7:53:00的发言:首先句意重心变了,A重在说species 出现,而E重在说species 消失,我觉得这个是最主要的错误
them我觉得只是不太好,没觉得致命,但是以现在分词出现的独立主格有点曲解原意,vanishing?怎么说也是个vanished
同意。句子重心被改变了。仅凭这一点,足以排除它。
用vanishing也确实不好,没有原意中“已经灭绝”的意思了。
作者: wenchang 时间: 2010-9-18 11:28
以下是引用lijiahui0422在2009/7/27 7:53:00的发言:
首先句意重心变了,A重在说species 出现,而E重在说species 消失,我觉得这个是最主要的错误
them我觉得只是不太好,没觉得致命,但是以现在分词出现的独立主格有点曲解原意,vanishing?怎么说也是个vanished
同意。句子重心被改变了。仅凭这一点,足以排除它。
用vanishing也确实不好,没有原意中“已经灭绝”的意思了。
-- by 会员 lihanljz (2009/9/15 17:27:00)
句子中心被改变也应该是E错啊,因为A是原意。。。
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |