ChaseDream

标题: 求助GWD30-Q26以及GWD30-Q28 [打印本页]

作者: scarlett8327 时间: 2009-7-21 16:47
标题: 求助GWD30-Q26以及GWD30-Q28

这两题是用以相互比较的两题：

GWD30-Q26:

In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered. Some commentators have argued, correctly, that since there is no objective test for whiplash, spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified. These commentators are, however, wrong to draw the further conclusion
that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious: clearly, in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion drawn to support the judgement reached by the argument on the accuracy of that finding.

B. The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the accuracy of that finding.

C. The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument criticizes.

D. The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a narrower claim that the argument accepts.

B. The first is claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

答案选c。我选了b。

GWD30-Q28:

In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered. Presently, no objective test for whiplash exists, so it is true that spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified. Nevertheless, these facts do not warrant a conclusion that has been drawn by some commentators: that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious. Clearly, in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that claim.

B. The first is claim that has been used to support a position that the argument accepts; the second is a position that the argument rejects.

C. The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is the judgment reached by the argument concerning the accuracy of the finding.

D. The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second is the judgment reached by the argument concerning one alleged implication.

E. The first is a finding, the explanation of which is at issue in the argument; the second is an objection that has been raised against the explanation that the argument defends.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

答案为d。我选了c。

两题我都似懂非懂，但可以肯定的是排出了26题d、e选项以及28题的a、b选项。请nn帮我解答！谢谢了！！！

[此贴子已经被作者于2009/7/21 16:49:41编辑过]

作者: boum 时间: 2009-8-8 21:53
up

作者: rourou1029 时间: 2010-4-28 17:58
同问Q28 C选项

作者: 月落乌啼 时间: 2010-4-30 15:39
claim既然已经可以排除，就看finding的。首先这里质疑的并非是finding本身数据的准确性，而是这一finding所代表的含义，由此就可以排除26题的A，B选项了。

具体说的话，这个含义，就是在说既然A国的受伤报告是B国的2倍，而B国明显没有造假动机，那么是否说明A国中有一半的报告都是假的（当然这里有一个前提就是认为正常情况下交通事故中出现此类伤情的概率是差不多的）。文中提到的conclusion认为”是的“，而本文主旨认为”不是的”。所以finding这个数据是真实的，只是在讨论这数据是否能得出那样的结论。

28题同。

作者: keith139 时间: 2010-7-5 11:16

claim既然已经可以排除，就看finding的。首先这里质疑的并非是finding本身数据的准确性，而是这一finding所代表的含义，由此就可以排除26题的A，B选项了。

具体说的话，这个含义，就是在说既然A国的受伤报告是B国的2倍，而B国明显没有造假动机，那么是否说明A国中有一半的报告都是假的（当然这里有一个前提就是认为正常情况下交通事故中出现此类伤情的概率是差不多的）。文中提到的conclusion认为”是的“，而本文主旨认为”不是的”。所以finding这个数据是真实的，只是在讨论这数据是否能得出那样的结论。

28题同。

-- by 会员月落乌啼 (2010/4/30 15:39:31)

这个是从哪里看出来的啊？我不认同
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries[A1] sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered.Some commentators have argued, correctly, that since there is presently no objective[A2] test for whiplash, spurious[A3] reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified.These commentators are, however, wrong to draw the further conclusionthat in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious:clearly, in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered.

[A1]颈椎过度屈伸损伤
a neck injury caused when your head moves forward and back again suddenly and violently, especially in a car accident: One officer suffered whiplash injuries.
[A2]客观的，不带偏见的
[A3]伪造的，假的，欺骗性的
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
26. 题目是说因为现在没有可以客观的测量这个报告真实性的test，所以虚假的报告也不能被发现。

我个人认为，这两句都在however之前，肯定都是被反对的。第一句是一个findings，而且它暗含的结论正是文章想批判的，所以说at issue. 第二句不是evidence，是commentator的一个结论，但它是在commentator的conclusion之前的中间结论，见蓝色部分。C正确
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
28题的第二句黑体，是反过来说的，相对于26题
Nevertheless, these facts do not warrant a conclusion that has been drawn by some commentators:that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious. 这句黑体和前边的一句黑体中间有转折，说明两者关系是相反的，重点看他们谁跟文章的主结论一致。显然是后一句，并且它不是evidence，可以排除A，B了，看剩下的关于第二句黑体
C.The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is the judgment reached by the argument concerning the accuracy of the finding.这里不是对于前一句BF的准确性说的
D.The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second is the judgment reached by the argument concerning one alleged implication.这里是对finding的implication的判断，正确
E. The first is a finding, the explanation of which is at issue in the argument; the second is an objection[A1] that has been raised against the explanation that the argument defends. 第二句是跟文章结论一致的，而不是对立的
[A1]反对，异议；厌恶；反对的理由

以上为个人见解，欢迎拍砖

作者: aegeano 时间: 2010-8-6 01:02
up

作者: yo16 时间: 2010-9-19 23:05

-- by 会员月落乌啼 (2010/4/30 15:39:31)

-- by 会员 keith139 (2010/7/5 11:16:34)

本来看的云里雾里不知道什么意思的，看到KEITH的解释豁然开朗，UPUPUP！！！

作者: longyan009 时间: 2011-4-26 15:10
还是没有明白26题，a选项的错误原因。

作者: lolitatu 时间: 2011-6-10 12:51

这两题是用以相互比较的两题：

GWD30-Q26:

In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered. Some commentators have argued, correctly, that since there is no objective test for whiplash, spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified. These commentators are, however, wrong to draw the further conclusion
that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious: clearly, in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion drawn to support the judgement reached by the argument on the accuracy of that finding.
B. The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the accuracy of that finding.
C.The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument criticizes.

D. The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a narrower claim that the argument accepts.

B. The first is claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
答案选c。我选了b。

GWD30-Q28:

resently, no objective test for whiplash exists, so it is true that spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified. Nevertheless, these facts do not warrant a conclusion that has been drawn by some commentators: that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious. Clearly, in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that claim.

B. The first is claim that has been used to support a position that the argument accepts; the second is a position that the argument rejects.

C. The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is the judgment reached by the argument concerning the accuracy of the finding.

D. The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second is the judgment reached by the argument concerning one alleged implication.

E. The first is a finding, the explanation of which is at issue in the argument; the second is an objection that has been raised against the explanation that the argument defends.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
答案为d。我选了c。

两题我都似懂非懂，但可以肯定的是排出了26题d、e选项以及28题的a、b选项。请nn帮我解答！谢谢了！！！

[此贴子已经被作者于2009/7/21 16:49:41编辑过]

-- by 会员 scarlett8327 (2009/7/21 16:47:00)

在下居然跟LZ错的一模一样,GWD20

作者: tiansam1990 时间: 2011-9-30 10:35

-- by 会员月落乌啼 (2010/4/30 15:39:31)

-- by 会员 keith139 (2010/7/5 11:16:34)

这个是正解！！！

作者: Jane412 时间: 2011-12-4 17:23
keith139 讲的很清楚~~

作者: 典座 时间: 2020-7-5 00:44
居然错的一模一样，这俩太有迷惑性了吧

作者: 典座 时间: 2020-7-5 00:53
有一个疑问，紧跟着BF2后面那句话说数据一半是假的，所以我才选的accuracy。后面结论和BF2离得有点远。
说下我做错题的思路——
BF1:人们发现车辆保险有保whiplash injuries这个伤的地区比保险不保这个的地区事故高出两倍。
这个没有十几根据说明和车辆保险有关。
BF2:但是一些评论人不保证这个结论，因为：…….

这里可以看出两个BF是相反方向的。而且BF1是一个事实，后面跟着一个结论。这个结论在BF2中被反驳，之后的未划线部分给出反驳原因。且作者观点和BF2一致。
根据这个思路先排除ABE.

再仔细读一下后面的解释——那个有whiplash injuries高事故的国家，一半的报告都是假的。
到这里我就直接选了C。因为后面讨论的就是数据的准确性啊.........

之后才会有作者的结论——因此，不包含whiplash injuries补偿的国家，人们不会有意愿去报告他们遭受了这个伤害。

我有点迷惑了啊.......有木有大牛解答？谢谢了

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)