ChaseDream

标题: GWD17-Q2-Q5 [打印本页]

作者: fly2010carol 时间: 2009-7-19 15:32
标题: GWD17-Q2-Q5

Q2 to Q4:

Recent feminist scholarship con-

cerning the United States in the 1920’s

challenges earlier interpretations that

Line assessed the twenties in terms of the

(5)
unkept “promises” of the women’s

suffrage movement. This new scholar-

ship disputes the long-held view that 怎么也不明白这两句话（及三个词）到底什么意思……

because a women’s voting bloc did not

materialize after women gained the right

(10) to vote in 1920, suffrage failed to

produce long-term political gains for

women. These feminist scholars also

challenge the old view that pronounced

suffrage a failure for not delivering on

(15) the promise that the women’s vote

would bring about moral, corruption-

free governance.
Asked whether

women’s suffrage was a failure, these

scholars cite the words of turn-of-the-

(20) century social reformer Jane Addams,

“Why don’t you ask if suffrage in

general is failing?”

In some ways, however, these

scholars still present the 1920’s as a

(25) period of decline. After suffrage, they

argue, the feminist movement lost its

cohesiveness, and gender conscious-

ness waned. After the mid-1920’s, few

successes could be claimed by fem-

(30) inist reformers: little could be seen in

the way of legislative victories.

During this decade, however, there

was intense activism aimed at achiev-

ing increased autonomy for women,

(35)
broadening the spheres within which

they lived their daily lives. Women’s

organizations worked to establish

opportunities for women: they strove to

secure for women the full entitlements

(40) of citizenship, including the right to hold

office and the right to serve on juries.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q2:

The passage is primarily concerned with

providing evidence indicating that feminist reformers of the 1920’s failed to reach some of their goals
presenting scholarship that contrasts suffragist “promises” with the historical realities of the 1920’s
discussing recent scholarship concerning the achievements of women’s suffrage during the 1920’s and presenting an alternative view of those achievements
outlining recent findings concerning events leading to suffrage for women in the 1920’s and presenting a challenge to those findings
providing support for a traditional view of the success of feminist attempts to increase gender consciousness among women during the 1920’s

Answer:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q3:

It can be inferred that the author of the passage disagrees with the “new scholarship” mentioned in lines 6-7 regarding the

degree to which the “promises” of the suffrage movement remained unkept
degree to which suffrage for women improved the morality of governance
degree to which the 1920’s represented a period of decline for the feminist movement
degree of legislative success achieved by feminist reformers during the 1920’s
accuracy of the view that a women’s voting bloc did not materialize once suffrage was achieved

Answer:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q4:

The purpose of the second paragraph (lines 23-31) of the passage is to

suggest a reason why suffragist “promises” were not kept
contrast suffragist “promises” with the reality of the 1920’s
deplore the lack of successful feminist reform in 1920’s
explain a view held by feminist scholars
answer the question asked by Jane Addams

作者: fly2010carol 时间: 2009-7-25 16:14
大牛帮忙看看啥意思……

作者: amorette 时间: 2009-8-13 23:59

读了N 遍仍然疑惑中

These feminist scholars also

challenge （the old view that pronounced

suffrage a failure for not delivering on

the promise that the women’s vote

would bring about moral, corruption-

free governanc.

到底是 The feminist scholars also chanllenge (the old view that...)

还是 The feminist scholars also chanllenge (the old view ) that ...

也就是说，scholars到底意思说suffrage是一个failure，还是反对把suffrage说成是failure的说法

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)