ChaseDream

标题: 求教：两个OG题的比较 [打印本页]

作者: CasualWalk 时间: 2003-5-11 15:53
标题: 求教：两个OG题的比较
"Require of sb. to do sth."

109说 "in C, Requires of ... employers to pay" is "ungrammatical";  #181用"Require of sb. to survive" 来作正确选择。如何解释呢？谢谢！

原题如下，109为A， #181为B：

109. Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario
requires of both public and private employers that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are usually held by men.
(A)    that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are
(B)    that pay for jobs historically held by women should be the same as for a job requiring comparable skills
(C)    to pay the same in jobs historically held by women as in jobs of comparable skill that are
(D)    to pay the same regardless of whether a job was historically held by women or is one demanding comparable skills
(E)    to pay as much for jobs historically held by women as for a job demanding comparable skills

181. Because of the enormous research and
development expenditures required to survive in the electronics industry, an industry marked by rapid innovation and volatile demand, such firms tend to be very large.
(A)    to survive
(B)    of firms to survive
(C)    for surviving
(D)    for survival
(E)    for firms' survival

作者: 1stzhang 时间: 2003-5-11 16:06
1、关键是动词的合理的发出：Require of sb/sth. to do sth.的do的发出必须是sb/sth.

2、109题的主要考点是平行结构，你再体会一下。

作者: CasualWalk 时间: 2003-5-11 16:58

以下是引用1stzhang在2003-5-11 16:06:00的发言：
1、关键是动词的合理的发出：Require of sb/sth. to do sth.的do的发出必须是sb/sth.

2、109题的主要考点是平行结构，你再体会一下。

同意。但我仍不理解为什么OG认为109中的 "require..." ungrammatical。我觉得两
个例子中的主语都符合条件啊？谢谢。

作者: siebel 时间: 2003-5-11 20:24
这里涉及到require地用法。

require of sb. to do sth.永远错（想不想白用？）。
require sb. to do sth.才对。
so, 109 CDE are ungrammatical。

nevertheless，为什么181又对了呢？那是因为181永乐require的另一个结构：
require sth. of sb. to do。这又是对的了。
Because of sth1. required of firms to survive in BJ. 注意用的是because of，所以required是过去份此作定于修饰sth1.，标被动。还原后，应该是：sb. required sth1. of firms to do...所以，应该可以的。

瞎桌么的，fyi only.

作者: CasualWalk 时间: 2003-5-12 02:07
有道理。。。 siebel换新房子了，祝贺祝贺，呵呵。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)