20 The hognose snake puts on an impressive bluff, hissing and rearing back, broadens the flesh behind its head the way a cobra does, feigning repeated strikes, but, having no dangerous fangs and no venom, eventually, if its pursuer is not cowed by the performance, will fall over and play dead.
(A) broadens the flesh behind its head the way a cobra does, feigning repeated strikes, but, having no dangerous fangs and no venom,
(B)
broadens the flesh behind its head the way a cobra does and feigns repeated strikes, but with no dangerous fangs and no venom,
(C) broadening the flesh behind its head the way a cobra does and feigning repeated strikes, but it has no dangerous fangs and no venom, and
(D) broadening the flesh behind its head the way a cobra does and feigns repeated strikes, but with no dangerous fangs and no venom, and
(E) broadening the flesh behind its head the way a cobra does, feigning repeated strikes, but with no dangerous fangs and no venom, and
纠结于B选项。看了很多帖子,大家排除b的原因除了逻辑意思是错的,主要集中在下面两点1.but 后面缺少主语 2."puts on , broadens and feigns "不对,应该用"puts on , broadens , and feigns "
对于1, 我认为,but 后的主语因为是前面的snake, 可以省略, 如Prep1-35,
In laboratory rats, a low dose of aspirin usually suffices to block production of thromboxane, a substance that promotes blood clotting,
but does not seriously interfere with the production of prostacyclin, which prevents clotting.
对于2, 我不清楚这种解释是否可以用来排除B,因为白勇的语法里“句子1,句子2 ,and 句子3” 和 “句子1,句子2 and 句子3” 都是正确的。所以不知道是不是V1,V2,and V3= V1, V2 and V3 .
如果这样,在没明白逻辑意思(并列问题)的情况下,只通过语法知识是不是不能排除B选项啊? 不知道自己这样想对不。。。 请教大家
我也很想知道A,B,andC 是不是等于A,B and C.希望NN帮助。
对于B,很明显的一条,eventually是副词,不能加句子。C就可以
个人的一些看法,这个问题的答案牵涉很多别的条件,比如a,b,c本身的结构,句子外的结构等。就此题来说,A,B and C的结构等同于A,B,and C的结构,因为B and C之外没有更高层次的并列了,所以不存在b and c跳出a的逻辑层次和更高层次并列的问题,但是有些时候是有这样的问题的,比如:X1 do1 sth1 that do2 sth2, do3 sth3 and do4 sth4,此时后面的do3和do4到底是在定语从句之内还是跳出定语从句和do1并列就是有歧义的,所以就需要改为a,b,and c的结构。上题的B选项主要是but后面缺少主语,这样with引导的状语缺乏修饰对象,另外当然逻辑意思很重要,第一个字句明显后面的动作都是bluff的进一步描述,把他们跟puts on并列逻辑上不对;
几点个人看法:
(1)在这里puts on , broadens and feigns = puts on , broadens , and feigns
(2)逻辑上也是对的,都是hognose snake的动作
(3)with的逻辑主语被省略了,感觉应该可以这样用。但我找不到例证,请NN来补充。
liu_leaf ,谢谢这么详细的讲解,但还有些不明白
比如:X1 do1 sth1 that do2 sth2, do3 sth3 and do4 sth4,此时后面的do3和do4到底是在定语从句之内还是跳出定语从句和do1并列就是有歧义的,所以就需要改为a,b,and c的结构。
问1) 那改成do3 sth3 ,and do sth4 后,是和2并列,还是和大层次1并列呢?
问2) But 后面虽然没有主语,但我认为是为避免重复snake而省掉的,句子结构是but with...,if..,(snake) will fall over.. 这样想可以吗?
hehe ,可能有点钻牛角尖,不过还是希望NN解答下~
顶上去~
求解
liu_leaf ,谢谢这么详细的讲解,但还有些不明白
比如:X1 do1 sth1 that do2 sth2, do3 sth3 and do4 sth4,此时后面的do3和do4到底是在定语从句之内还是跳出定语从句和do1并列就是有歧义的,所以就需要改为a,b,and c的结构。
问1) 那改成do3 sth3 ,and do sth4 后,是和2并列,还是和大层次1并列呢?
问2) But 后面虽然没有主语,但我认为是为避免重复snake而省掉的,句子结构是but with...,if..,(snake) will fall over.. 这样想可以吗?
hehe ,可能有点钻牛角尖,不过还是希望NN解答下~
顶~~
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |