107 Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology.
A. Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a techinique called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
C. A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
正确答案选A,按OG的说法是因为A: This participial phrase is immediately followed by the word technique that it modifies; technique is in turn followed by the phrase called proton-induced X-ray emission. Finally the nonrestrictive clause which...destroying it is correctly placed next to emission and set off from the rest of the sentence by a pair of commas.
而针对为何C错,OG解释是:Called proton-induced X-ray emission should be placed next to a technique and should not be set off by cocmmas; relative clause introduced by which incorrectly and illogically modifies emission.
撇开其他方面不说,A和C的共同之处就在于emission后面都被逗号隔开,有which开头的非限定从句,这样看来which引导的从句无论是在A还是C里,都是在修饰emission的,不是吗?为什么A里which的位置就是对的,而C里就错了呢?
多谢牛牛指教~!!
我想在og对c地解释中,relative一词很重要。 也就是说,因为called短语修饰位置的错误,导致which从句修饰emission改变了整个句子的逻辑结构。而不是单纯就which放在这个位置,是不是修饰emission而言的。which从句肯定是修饰emission没错。
我想在og对c地解释中,relative一词很重要。 也就是说,因为called短语修饰位置的错误,导致which从句修饰emission改变了整个句子的逻辑结构。而不是单纯就which放在这个位置,是不是修饰emission而言的。which从句肯定是修饰emission没错。
谢谢xfi882牛牛,那这样看的话,A里which就不是修饰emission,而是修饰technique了吗..?非限定从句难道不是修饰离which最近的事物吗...?
不好意思我喜欢钻牛角尖>.<
按照逻辑,A里面的which从句确实是修饰tech;C里面修饰的是air pollution。但是从语法角度讲,这两个which从句都是修饰emission
不明白就接着问。我该睡觉了,夜里3点多了。快!
which在两个选项里都是离emission近,那都是修饰emission而非technique的对吧?
按xfi883你的理解是不是因为C里emission位置错导致句子逻辑结构错?那再弱弱地问一下哦:A和C因emission位置改变而产生了怎样逻辑的不同呢...?
我知道我很啰嗦...不过还是想弄清楚..谢谢~
不是因为emission位置错,而是a tech位置错。我相信你已经知道了为什么C不正确了吧。
别客气。你问得不弱!嗬嗬
天啊..xfi883你在美国吗怎么这么晚,我们这里才6点过而已..
辛苦辛苦,你先睡吧,真是不好意思!!!
别,我不喜欢半途而废。你尽管问。你不是在中国吧。中国现在应该是下午4点。快问吧,我得给你回答明白了。
好,那我继续了哦..
C里a tech位置错吗?但是OG明确指出是called...位置错,应放在a tech旁边..
C里逻辑怎么不对了呢?which怎么又变成修饰air pollutats了呀?
我在澳洲呢
ok。A的意思是说,为了侦测空气污染,一种称为proton-induced X-ray emission的科技。。。,这种科技能快速分析化学元素。C的意思是说,一种科技为了侦测污染,这种污染被称作proton-induced X-ray emission。。。
所以,proton-induced X-ray emission再A中修饰的是科技,在C中修饰的是污染。而which从句不论在A还是C中修饰的都是emission。
原来是这样啊...真是难为xfi883了,费了九牛二虎之力我终于明白了...
实在是非常,非常感谢加不好意思...还耽误了你的睡眠时间>.<
事实再次证明CD上的牛牛们都是angel的化身...
澳洲这里更加无聊..呵呵..
我可以加你msn吗?用牛牛你提供的email地址,哈...
我怎么觉得og解释里面是说,C的which指代emissions,所以错误,那么是不是说A里面就是指代tch呢,如果这样的话,是不是说which在A里面不是就近修饰,而是跳跃修饰核心词呢?。。。谁能解答一下???
对,不是就近修饰,但跳跃修饰是有原则的,像这种called 分词修饰必须放在所修饰名词后面,那么定语从句也只好通过跳跃修饰来修饰前面的词,我觉得这是个没法再改进的表达...也就是怎么改也得跳跃修饰
对于C 跳跃修饰还没见过可以跳过谓语来修饰前面的名词的,比如 A do B with C , which... which 有修饰B和C的可能,要根据逻辑意思判断,但是无论如何也管不到A,这就是我对跳跃修饰的理解
我觉得白勇的这个原则对这道题很有用:名词的修饰语要有层次地分布在名词前后
c就是全挤到后面去啦
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |