ChaseDream

标题: LR0510-3-20 [打印本页]

作者: sevfye 时间: 2009-6-8 03:12
标题: LR0510-3-20
Philosopher: It is absurd to argue that peopel are morally obligated to act in a certain way simply because not action in that way would be unnatural. An unnatural action is either a violation of the laws of nature or a statistical anomaly. There is no possibility of acting as one cannot, nor does the mere fact that something is not usually done provide any good reason not do it.

Which one of the following most accurately describes a technique used in the philosohpehr's argument?

B stating the definition of a key term of the argument

能不能解释一下最后一句话什么意思?"There is no possibility of acting as one cannot"-----很奇怪?

作者: crusoecrusoe 时间: 2009-6-8 10:11

“no possibility of acting as one cannot, nor ”

“no ... cannot, nor”

双重否定表肯定，只要厘清长句之断句。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)