Magazine Publisher: Our magazine does not have a liberal bias. It is true that when a book review we had commissioned last year turned out to express distinctly conservative views, we did not publish it until we had also obtained a second review that took a strongly liberal position. Clearly, however, our actions demonstrate not a bias in favor of liberal views but rather a commitment to a balanced presentation of diverse opinions.
Determining which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the cogency of the magazine publisher’s response?
A. Whether any other magazines in which the book was reviewed carried more than one review of the book
B. Whether the magazine publishes unsolicited book reviews as well as those that it has commissioned
C. Whether in the event that a first review commissioned by the magazine takes a clearly liberal position the magazine would make any efforts to obtain further reviews
D. Whether the book that was the subject of the two reviews was itself written from a clearly conservative or a clearly liberal point of view
E. Whether most of the readers of the magazine regularly read the book reviews that the magazine publishes
我对这段话的理解是这样的：我们的杂志没有liberal偏见。有这样一个事实：去年，我们委托写的一个书评的观点是明显保守的，我们没有发表它直到我们收到了第二个书评，第二个书评表达的是自由的立场。很显然，我们的行为证明：我们不是偏爱自由的观点，而是承诺平衡不同观点的表达。
我对这段话的理解是这样的：我们的杂志没有liberal偏见。有这样一个事实：去年，我们委托写的一个书评的观点是明显保守的，我们没有发表它直到我们收到了第二个书评，第二个书评表达的是自由的立场。很显然，我们的行为证明：我们不是偏爱自由的观点，而是承诺平衡不同观点的表达。
答案：c。
答案：c。
这个选项我就没有看明白，请高手指点。
这个选项我就没有看明白，请高手指点。
题干中的陈述：当杂志社先得到一篇conservative的时候，要等libral出来 再发布
这只能说明追求平衡，依旧有帮助libral的嫌疑。
如果杂志社先得到一篇libral的时候，同样也能等到conservative 再发布，才能说明杂志对libral没有偏向
C选项 杂志社是否在当得到一篇libral的书评，是否会进一步等更多书评
如果是，说明平衡，如果不是，说明对libral有偏向。
也许是你读的太细了
除c其他都可以排除
楼主分析的非常好，谢谢。
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |