大全-16-3.
It would cost Rosetown one million dollars to repair all of its roads. In the year after completion of those repairs, however, Rosetown would thereby avoid incurring three million dollars worth of damages, since currently Rosetown pays that amount annually in compensation for damage done to cars each year by its unrepaired roads.
Which of the following, if true, gives the strongest support to the argument above?
(A) Communities bordering on Rosetown also pay compensation for damage done to cars by their unrepaired roads.
(B) After any Rosetown road has been repaired, several years will elapse before that road begins to damage cars.
(C) Rosetown would need to raise additional taxes if it were to spend one million dollars in one year on road repairs.
(D) The degree of damage caused to Rosetown’s roads by harsh weather can vary widely from year to year.
(E) Trucks cause much of the wear on Rosetown’s roads, but owners of cars file almost all of the claims for compensation for damage caused by unrepaired roads.
我选E。答案是B。 我觉得B并没有E好啊。望大家指教。
急急急。。。23号就考试了。。。关键是不知道自己错哪里。。。真尴尬。。。
一直在刷网页。。都没有人回。。。哭了。。
该题要支持的是：路修好前，该镇每年要支付3 MILLION用于路不好对车造成的损害，路修好后，这笔钱就省下了。
B的意思是路修好后，有好几年都没对车造成损害。所以支持该结论。
E的意思是TRUCK对路造成磨损，CARS的车主却要求路对他们的车的损害要求赔偿。言下之意是他们该找TRUCK车主要求赔偿。不管怎样，这对结论没有任何关系。所以无关。
我觉得B好，原因是：
1、题干里并没有提到truck和car对路损坏的情况
2、题干里重点讨论的是花费 one million dollars 修路是否有价值，每有提到是谁申请修路的内容
我觉得B好，原因是：
1、题干里并没有提到truck和car对路损坏的情况
2、题干里重点讨论的是花费 one million dollars 修路是否有价值，每有提到是谁申请修路的内容
这个思路适合上考场~~~~
原文大意：
因为：花钱修路避免了车辆在路上的损失
所以：修路划算
本文要支持“因为”。B恰好是完全表达了“因为”的内容，从而支持了结论。E正好相反，是“反驳”了结论，而不是支持！它的意思是：truck造成了车损，而不是路，从而我们可以得出相反的结论——没必要修路。
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |