ChaseDream

标题: GWD-22-11 MS没有讨论过... [打印本页]

作者: 天冥翼 时间: 2009-5-30 19:10
标题: GWD-22-11 MS没有讨论过...

There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.

There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.
There are no legal limits on the size of monkfish that can be caught, unlike cod or haddock, a circumstance that contributes to depleting them because they are being overfished.
There are legal limits on the size of cod and haddock that can be caught, but not for monkfish, which contributes to its depletion through overfishing.
Unlike cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, which contributes to its depletion by being overfished.
Unlike catching cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, contributing to their depletion because they are overfished.

答案给的C，我选的A

C里面的which就近指代monkfish引起歧义呀，还是说fish只能用its不能用their所以不选A？？

请大家指点，谢谢！！

作者: AlienX 时间: 2009-5-31 05:41
P2#217: A

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)