ChaseDream

标题: prep2-47 [打印本页]

作者: sophialj    时间: 2009-5-28 17:49
标题: prep2-47

47.  (33183-!-item-!-188;#058&007560)

 

Traditionally, decision-making by managers that is reasoned step-by-step has been considered preferable to intuitive decision-making.  However, a recent study found that top managers used intuition significantly more than did most middle- or lower-level managers.  This confirms the alternative view that intuition is actually more effective than careful, methodical reasoning.

 

The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?

 

(A) Methodical, step-by-step reasoning is inappropriate for making many real-life management decisions.

(B) Top managers have the ability to use either intuitive reasoning or methodical, step-by-step reasoning in making decisions.

(C) The decisions made by middle- and lower-level managers can be made as easily by using methodical reasoning as by using intuitive reasoning.

(D) Top managers use intuitive reasoning in making the majority of their decisions.

(E) Top managers are more effective at decision-making than middle- or lower-level managers.

NN帮忙解释下D为什么错了top managers used intuition significantly more than did most middle- or lower-level managers不就是说主要靠直觉做决定?答案E

没想通


作者: LUCIE_SIMON    时间: 2009-5-28 18:24

fact:top managers used intuition significantly more than did most middle- or lower-level managers

conclusion:intuition is actually more effective than careful, methodical reasoning.

讲的是effective,只是多,而不管用是不能说明effective的.同样D只说了多,从fact到conclusion是有gap的


作者: sophialj    时间: 2009-5-28 22:35

Got it,thanks LUCIE_SIMON


作者: alpaca    时间: 2010-8-24 22:29
这里的middle- or lower-level managers 不算是无关因素么?我一看到他们就把这个选项排除了……
请NN解释一下吧~~




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3