ChaseDream

标题: 绝望了 [打印本页]

作者: mayanan    时间: 2009-5-14 12:54
标题: 绝望了

各位,帮忙看看,讲解一下,谢了哦!

ROSS: The profitability of company X, restored to private ownership five years age, is clear evidence that businesses will always fare better under private than under public ownership.  

JULIA: Wrong, A close look at the records shows that X has been profitable since the appointment of a first-class management, which happened while X was still in the public sector.

Which of the following best describes the weak point in Ross’s claim on which Julia response focuses?      

A.      The evidence Ross cites comes from only a single observed case, that of company X      

B.      The profitability of Company X might be only temporary

C.      Ross’s statement leaves open the possibility that cause he cites came after the effect he attributes to it

D.     No mention is made of companies that are partly government owned and partly privately owned

E.   No exact figures are given for current profits of company X           


[此贴子已经被作者于2009-5-17 8:45:16编辑过]

作者: mayanan    时间: 2009-5-15 15:27
同志们,怎么没有人帮忙看看呀!各位。。。。。。
作者: mayanan    时间: 2009-5-17 01:46

大家都很忙呀,没有人帮助哦!伤心中~~~~~


作者: mayanan    时间: 2009-5-17 08:45

看来大家都很忙,绝望了快,答案是C,自己又研究了半天,结果吧ABDE都排除了,但是不知道为什么C是对的,因为C连语法都看不懂!


作者: anistonlucky    时间: 2009-5-17 11:13

C is the answer.

C means X's profitability is because of public management instead of private ownership, despite they become profitable after they go to private ownership, but that does not necessary mean the effect attributes to the later cause, maybe to the former cause, which is public ownership.


作者: mayanan    时间: 2009-5-17 13:38
太感谢了,豁然开朗啊,谢谢小熊哦!




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3