ChaseDream

标题: 争议题GWD25-Q24,之前的讨论贴不能说服我 [打印本页]

作者: eggegg    时间: 2009-5-13 13:24
标题: 争议题GWD25-Q24,之前的讨论贴不能说服我

24. GWD25-Q24

Although improved efficiency in converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices, thereby boosting consumption.

 

A.      in converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest
        
rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices, thereby boosting

B.       in converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest
        
rates, demand will be stimulated because of increasing supply and
        
lowering prices, which boost

C.      of converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices,
        
which boosts

D.      of harvested trees being converted into wood products may reduce
        
harvest rates, it will stimulate demand, because it will increase supply
        
and lower prices, thereby boosting

E.       when harvested trees are converted into wood products may reduce harvest rates, demand will be stimulated because of increasing supply
        
and lowering prices, which boost

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A B 讨论贴的答案都倾向于选A

虽然讨论贴中大家都倾向选A,但是我反而对B有点偏向,我认为关键是,我觉得boost consumption只需要lower price就可以引起了呀,增加supply与boost consumption无关呀,所以我觉得因该用which boost去修饰lowering prices, 而不该用分词伴随整个句子。请NN帮忙再看看,就要考试了,感激不尽。。。


作者: jbyupei    时间: 2009-5-13 14:03

BOOSTING的逻辑主语可不是 INCREASING SUPPLY AND LOWERING PRICE, 而是 IT , 也就是 efficiency

S.V.O,DOING  ,    the logic subject of doing must be S(or a full sentence), otherwise we prefer attribute clause to modify O.

in addition, B is not appropriate, because main clause has no obvious relationship with adverbial clause. but, in A, the word "it" in the main clause represent a close relationship with previous part 


作者: kissmorekiss    时间: 2009-5-13 14:42

which 不好。。。

increase  supply===》lower price,如果lz认为只有price导致boosting的话,supply也应该是因素。

被动语态不好。


作者: huliyu123456    时间: 2009-6-19 19:22

支持B,根据语意,应该是increasing supply and lowering prices 导致的consumption提高,所以B中which更好地表达这个意思:

而A中表达的意思是demand stimulate这件事导致的consumption提高,所以是错误的


作者: redredsun    时间: 2009-6-20 12:02
选B A里面BOOSTING做it的伴随   逻辑上不成立  应该是DEMAND提高了CONSUMPTION而不是IT
作者: racing78    时间: 2009-6-20 12:42

不大贊同選B.理由是整個句子的意思是improved efficiency雖然可能降低砍伐率,但improved efficiency將透過降低價格和提升供應,刺激消費。

當然B的文法是正確的,但是卻無法凸顯出前後句子的對比關係,亦即improved efficiency雖然能夠

降低harvest rate,達到環保目的,但因為更好的效率導致用同樣多的樹木可以致更多產品,所以價格會下降且產量會上升,因而導致消費的上升。所以要說improved efficiency能夠boosting是合乎邏輯的。


作者: laura466    时间: 2009-7-24 16:32
up
作者: vivian0331    时间: 2009-7-28 01:34
以下是引用eggegg在2009/5/13 13:24:00的发言:

24. GWD25-Q24

Although improved efficiency in converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices, thereby boosting consumption.

A.      in converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest
  
rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices, thereby boosting

B.       in converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest
  
rates, demand will be stimulated because of increasing supply and
  
lowering prices, which boost

C.      of converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices,
  
which boosts

D.      of harvested trees being converted into wood products may reduce
  
harvest rates, it will stimulate demand, because it will increase supply
  
and lower prices, thereby boosting

E.       when harvested trees are converted into wood products may reduce harvest rates, demand will be stimulated because of increasing supply
  
and lowering prices, which boost

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A B 讨论贴的答案都倾向于选A

虽然讨论贴中大家都倾向选A,但是我反而对B有点偏向,我认为关键是,我觉得boost consumption只需要lower price就可以引起了呀,增加supply与boost consumption无关呀,所以我觉得因该用which boost去修饰lowering prices, 而不该用分词伴随整个句子。请NN帮忙再看看,就要考试了,感激不尽。。。

这道题争议蛮大的,我最开始做题的时候也选得A。现在也倾向选B,理由跟楼主一样。

不过我也不sure,是否有定论啊?


作者: 藍士曜    时间: 2009-7-28 12:32
p p
作者: pwss    时间: 2009-7-30 20:36
up
作者: deadpig1987    时间: 2009-7-31 00:08
以下是引用eggegg在2009/5/13 13:24:00的发言:

24. GWD25-Q24

Although improved efficiency in converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices, thereby boosting consumption.

 

A.      in converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest
  
rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices, thereby boosting

B.       in converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest
  
rates, demand will be stimulated because of increasing supply and
  
lowering prices, which boost

C.      of converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices,
  
which boosts

D.      of harvested trees being converted into wood products may reduce
  
harvest rates, it will stimulate demand, because it will increase supply
  
and lower prices, thereby boosting

E.       when harvested trees are converted into wood products may reduce harvest rates, demand will be stimulated because of increasing supply
  
and lowering prices, which boost

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A B 讨论贴的答案都倾向于选A

虽然讨论贴中大家都倾向选A,但是我反而对B有点偏向,我认为关键是,我觉得boost consumption只需要lower price就可以引起了呀,增加supply与boost consumption无关呀,所以我觉得因该用which boost去修饰lowering prices, 而不该用分词伴随整个句子。请NN帮忙再看看,就要考试了,感激不尽。。。


lowering price 要先引起 demand的增加,然后才能引起实质性的消费的增加啊

而且lowering price也是要由于 increased supply才能引起的啊。这个学过最基本的经济学原理的都知道呢。 

你要说是 lowering price引起消费增加也可以。你要说 demand的增加引起消费的增加也可以。你要说 increased supply 引起消费增加也是有道理的。

但是其实是improved efficiency--> increasing supply (因为生产总量增加了)-->stimulate demand 

                                                ---> lowering prices (因为成本降低了)

这整个过程导致了 boosting consumption才更确切。这是我觉得A好的原因。 


B的话缺失了一个逻辑关系

 Although improved efficiency  in converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, demand will be stimulated because of increasing supply and lowering prices, which boost consumption. 

它说了 demand will be stimulated because of increasing supply and lowering price

但是它并没有说明这个increasing supply and lowering price是由于 improved efficieny 引起的

整个逻辑线就变成这样:

increased efficienty (注意了这里是断掉了)XXXXX  increasing supply and lowering price--> stimulate demand--> boost consumption


作者: XSeptember    时间: 2009-8-14 16:54
B中 increasing 和 lowering有问题吧。 如果说increasing是形容词的话,lowering就有问题。如果说increasing是现在分词,句子的主语demand又和动作矛盾
作者: Schnellv    时间: 2009-8-18 04:54

这个又错了,这次支持A


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/10/11 2:18:26编辑过]

作者: fiona_hq    时间: 2009-8-23 20:16
up
作者: shenhongshu    时间: 2009-8-23 21:40
同意A,which 在B里只能指代price 而忽略了与之并列的supply,有悖句子原意。
[此贴子已经被作者于2009/8/23 21:41:24编辑过]

作者: qqiaoer    时间: 2010-3-22 15:06
我支持B


A选项的IT指代improved efficiency,这样的话整个句子逻辑含义有问题.而且A选项结尾处的thereby boosting consumption. 也有修饰上的歧义


作者: 李学子    时间: 2012-4-30 09:09
此题毫无疑问选A
作者: matianyi90    时间: 2012-10-27 11:57
绝对是B改变原意,就已经决定了B必然是错的




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3