ChaseDream

标题: [求助]一道题逻辑题（是新东方材料里的） [打印本页]

作者: 关灵韶 时间: 2009-5-9 16:37
标题: [求助]一道题逻辑题（是新东方材料里的）

13.(Z)In 1960’s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding increases the number of attacks among the animals significantly. But in recent experiments in which rhesus monkeys were placed in crowded conditions, although there was an increase in instances of “coping” behavior—such as submissive gestures and avoidance of dominant individuals—attacks did not become any more frequent. Therefore it is not likely that, for any species of monkey, crowding increases aggression as significantly as was seen in rats.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A. All the observed forms of coping behavior can be found among rhesus monkeys living in uncrowded conditions.

B. In the studies of rats, nondominant individuals were found to increasingly avoid dominant individuals when the animals were in crowded conditions.

C. Rhesus monkeys respond with aggression to a wider range of stimuli than any other monkeys do.

D. Some individual monkeys in the experiment were involved in significantly more attacks than the other monkeys were.

E. Some of the coping behavior displayed by rhesus monkeys is similar to ehavior rhesus monkeys use to bring to an end an attack that has begun.

D是答案我想不明白D为什么对啊和individual monkey有什么关系啊

还有就是dominant individuals是什么意思啊

请大家来帮帮忙啊

作者: kissmorekiss 时间: 2009-5-9 18:22
答案应该是C吧，R猴子不怎么表现攻击+它们收到的刺激比其它类型的猴子多=所有的猴子都不怎么表现攻击

作者: jessica_cxy 时间: 2009-5-9 21:36

我认为是D,原因如下：

原文从“r猴”不怎么表现攻击，推出结论：“any” species of monkey也不会表现攻击，若如C所说，那么就削弱了这个推理

D正确，因为although there was an increase in instances of “coping” behavior—such as submissive gestures and avoidance of dominant individuals—attacks did not become any more frequent，就是as frequent as或less frequent，但总之还是frequent，所以对应Some individual monkeys in the experiment were involved in significantly more attacks than the other monkeys were.

个人看法，请NN指教！

作者: 关灵韶 时间: 2009-5-10 22:12

首先很感谢您的解答

Some individual monkeys in the experiment were involved in significantly more attacks than the other monkeys were.这句我还是理解的不大好请恕我愚钝，您能不能大致的译一下这句的意思啊。我想想看看是不是我语义理解的有问题

作者: qbfnigel 时间: 2009-5-11 22:14

非牛人

意思的话，Some individual monkeys in the experiment were involved in significantly more attacks than the other monkeys were我觉得是，有一些试验中的猴子，比起其他的猴子，遭到更多的攻击，

个人觉得答案是C。首先这题题目用的是ANALOGY,答案基本会说rhesus monkeys 对amimal有代表性，答案说R猴反应更加激烈。更是加强原文。逻辑为，R猴这种反应激烈的猴子都不increases aggression 正常的动物当然更加不会increases aggression 。

希望牛人指教

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)