ChaseDream

标题: GWD-TN11-Q8 [打印本页]

作者: asap 时间: 2009-5-5 21:57
标题: GWD-TN11-Q8

找了GWD的讨论贴，发现TN的题无论是按TN24的号还是以前的号都对不上，无奈之下只好发贴请大牛帮忙解答。

The number of applications for teaching positions in Newtown’s public schools was 5.7 percent lower in 1993 than in 1985 and 5.9 percent lower in 1994 than in 1985. despite a steadily growing student population and an increasing number of teacher resignations, however, Newtown does not face a shortage in the late 1990’s.

Which of the following, if true, would contribute most to an explanation of the apparent discrepancy above? C E

A. Many of Newtown’s public school students do not graduate from high school

B. New housing developments planned for Newtown are (shared) for occupancy in 1987 and are expected to increase the number of elementary school students in Newtown’s public

C. The Newtown school board does not contemplate increasing the ratio of students to teachers in the 1990’s.

D. Teachers’ colleges in and near Newtown produced lower graduates in 1994 than in 1993

E. In 1993 Newtown’s public schools received 40 percent more applications for teaching positions than there were positions available.

作的时候选的C，参考答案是E。

其实觉得C也不大对，但如果单凭申请教师职位的人增加了40%就判定NEWTON学校不缺老师的话，

那么前面一大堆的数据，包括年代和增长率，起到什么作用呢？

感觉有点混乱，请指教，谢谢。

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-5-5 22:02:11编辑过]

作者: mnbgtyujh 时间: 2009-5-6 18:23

个人意见,C肯定不对,有没有shortage客观的,学校contemplate是主观的,因此不能解释这个discrepancy.

E的意义其实就是,应聘teaching positions的人本来就很多(超过了positions available数40%),这个的话,相比起之前说的下降个5.7%,5.9%就不算什么了,所以才does not face a shortage

不知道对你有没有帮助呢?

作者: asap 时间: 2009-5-10 01:41
多谢楼上的指点，很有帮助

作者: 特仑苏爸爸 时间: 2010-3-23 01:11
请问选D为什么不对呢？

作者: hughlv 时间: 2010-3-23 10:58

请问选D为什么不对呢？

-- by 会员特仑苏爸爸 (2010/3/23 1:11:11)

D可以用于解释为什么application变少了，但没法用于支持文章的论点，即最后一句话。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)