ChaseDream

标题: prep83,关于后置定语修饰 [打印本页]
作者: ursula_1    时间: 2009-5-4 12:09
标题: prep83,关于后置定语修饰

83

Stock levels for domestic crude oil are far lower than in past years, leaving domestic oil prices vulnerable to any hints of oil supplies being disrupted in the Middle East or to any unexpected consumer demand growth possibly prompted by colder-than-normal temperatures.

 

(A) leaving domestic oil prices vulnerable to any hints of oil supplies being disrupted in the Middle East or to any unexpected consumer demand growth possibly

(B) leaving domestic oil prices vulnerable to any hints of oil supply disruptions in the Middle East or any unexpected growth in consumer demand that might be

(C) leaving domestic oil prices vulnerable to any hints of oil supplies that are disrupted in the Middle East or to any unexpected growth in consumer demand as was possibly

(D) resulting in the fact that domestic oil prices are vulnerable to any hints of oil supplies being disrupted in the Middle East or to any unexpected consumer demand growth possibly

(E) resulting in the fact of domestic oil prices that are vulnerable to any hints of oil supply disruptions in the Middle East or to any unexpected growth in consumer demand that might be

 

【考点】
        简洁(Concise)

1) being错误使用: 以下几种表达中being属于多余
            

a) being + n. b) being + adj。 c) as being + n./adj。/v-ing

2) as不能作为关系代词引导形容词子句，
        关系代词正确的使用:that(指代人，GMAT语法中that不能指代
            

人)，which(指代物)，who(指代人，主格)，whom(指代人，宾格)，whose(指代人或物)

(A) being多余，应该删除；分词后置定语promped…就近修饰growth不符合逻辑。
            

(B) 正确，
            leaving伴随结果做形容词修饰主词，结构简洁； that子句修饰consumer demand符合语法要求
            ;这里可以用might be 代替possibly

(C) as不能作为关系代词引导形容词子句
            

(D) being多余，应该删除；分词后置定语promped…就近修饰growth不符合逻辑。
            

(E) in the fact of不符合习惯用法，应该使用in the fact that

※句子结构: Stock levels… are far lower than…， leaving domestic oil price vulnerable to any hints of…

or any…demand growth…

 A 说分词后置定语promped…就近修饰growth不符合逻辑。；
                        哪位大侠解释一下，我感觉没有逻辑错误啊？

求教！谢谢

作者: ursula_1    时间: 2009-5-4 12:16

补充一个小问： 这里possibly和might be可以互换，为什么一些地方possibly 和can 不能互换，他们之间区别在哪里呢？

继续求教！

作者: AlienX    时间: 2009-5-5 09:09
- 不見得有logical problem...
- possibly一般都可以和might/could be/do換
- LZ記得那一題possibly不能和can換嗎(自己沒summarize, so can't articular clearly...)
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-5-5 14:11:01编辑过]
作者: ursula_1    时间: 2009-5-5 10:07

以OG11th 第8题为例：prep 中这样说道： 

Rising inventories, when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead to production cutbacks that would hamper economic growth。
            

 

(A) when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead

(B) when not accompanied corresponding by increases in sales, possibly leads

(C) when they were unaccompanied by corresponding sales increases can lead

(D) if not accompanied by correspondingly increased sales, possibly leads

(E) if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead

 

A，B，C用when子句来表示条件子句，排除

选项D中possibly改变了原句can的意思，排除，答案E
        

继续求教

作者: ursula_1    时间: 2009-5-5 10:33

还有，

分词后置定语promped…就近修饰growth不符合逻辑。 ;请问为什么啊？

作者: AlienX    时间: 2009-5-5 14:17
- umm...as I mentioned, 我看不出有誤修的問題...after all, I am not a native speaker...等我問問...
- OG11#8說leads有問題, 而不是possibly lead不能取代can lead.
作者: ursula_1    时间: 2009-5-6 09:10

辛苦版主了！谢谢！

作者: AlienX    时间: 2009-5-7 12:05
結果一個MGMAT老師跟我看法一樣 -- B中的that是指代any unexpected growth
所以A的prompted修any unexpected consumer demand growth邏輯上沒錯
是LZ看的解釋錯.
作者: ursula_1    时间: 2009-5-7 12:25

谢谢斑竹





欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3