ChaseDream

标题: GWD17-Q9 thanks~ [打印本页]

作者: 球球是我 时间: 2009-4-27 14:46
标题: GWD17-Q9 thanks~

Press Secretary:
Our critics claim that the President’s recent highway project
cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts
controlled by opposition parties. They
offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in
such districts. But all of the canceled
projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected
nonpartisan auditors. So the President’s
choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the
press secretary’s argument depends?

A.
Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the
President to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.

B.
The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in
the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s
party.

C.
The number of projects canceled was a significant
proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the
government in the near future.

D.
The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by
the President’s party were not generally more expensive than the projects
canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties.

E.
Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded
by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government
projects.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

答案是B，谁能帮我解释一下，谢谢~~

作者: jbyupei 时间: 2009-4-27 20:59

嘿，我怎么觉得选D啊

B 说被视为浪费的项目不全是本党街区的，也就是说有一部分是反对党街区的，也就是说反对党街区被废的项目是有一部分因为浪费被废的，不是歧视。这条路看似合理，但原文已经有一句话说90%被废的项目都是反对党街区的，并且所有被废项目都被视为了浪费，所以架上面那个桥根本无意义。

D 这么个思路，说因浪费被废的项目里面至少本党派街区的不比反对党街区的贵，这很合理啊，去非得话，比反对党街区的贵，还90%都废相对便宜反对党街区的，这不就有歧视了么，就削弱了呗

作者: pwss 时间: 2009-7-28 22:17
UP

作者: stoneliu 时间: 2009-7-29 10:17

可是文中只是说90%并没有提贵或不贵呀，感觉b更有根据些。不对之处请指正。

作者: jennyzhu 时间: 2010-11-29 01:11
文章说90%被cancelled的HP在总统反对党的district里，所以总统是在punish反对党。但是第三方评价所有被cancelled的HP都是wasteful的，所以得出最后结论à总统不是partisan politics。问假设

一个HP，先被第三方判定是不是wasteful，再有总统判定是不是被cancelled

B选项中的scheduled理解为没有被cancelled的HP。所以B说被判定为wasteful但是没有被cancelled的HP不是大部分在总统自己的district里面，加强了。取非，就是wasteful但是没有被cancelled的HP都是自己的，所以总统明显就偏袒自己的党派，削弱了。

作者: jbc88 时间: 2010-11-29 14:38

文章说90%被cancelled的HP在总统反对党的district里，所以总统是在punish反对党。但是第三方评价所有被cancelled的HP都是wasteful的，所以得出最后结论à总统不是partisan politics。问假设

一个HP，先被第三方判定是不是wasteful，再有总统判定是不是被cancelled

B选项中的scheduled理解为没有被cancelled的HP。所以B说被判定为wasteful但是没有被cancelled的HP不是大部分在总统自己的district里面，加强了。取非，就是wasteful但是没有被cancelled的HP都是自己的，所以总统明显就偏袒自己的党派，削弱了。

-- by 会员 jennyzhu (2010/11/29 1:11:23)

为什么 scheduled理解为没有被cancelled？？？？？？？？？

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)