85. (23981-!-item-!-188;#058&000656)
Fearing that the use of titles indicating position in the corporation tends to make the corporate hierarchy rigid by inhibiting communication, some corporations shun the use of executive titles. A title, however, can facilitate an executive's dealings with external businesses since it encourages outsiders to treat the executive with respect. The obvious compromise is for these executives to use their titles externally but not within their corporations.
Which of the following, if true, provides the most support for the compromise suggested above?
A. Only small corporations can preserve an atmosphere of mutual respect and high regard without having a rigid corporate hierarchy.
B. Referring to an executive by using a title can encourage both those outside the organization and inside the organization to treat the executive with respect.
C. Even if it is widely known within a corporation that the corporation's executives use executive titles outside their organizations, this knowledge does not by itself inhibit communication within the corporation.
D. A rigid corporate hierarchy can promote efficiency within an organization as well as provide access to the corporation for those outside the organization.
E. Although many corporate executives disapprove of rigid hierarchies on the grounds that they inhibit communication, the vast majority of executives have no qualms about using titles both internally and externally.
为什么我感觉C是削弱呢？ 请NN帮忙!
谁能翻译下这个题目啊？
试着翻译一下，不对请指正呵……
由于担心直接称呼管理者职位会使内部沟通拘谨，使组织内部显得级别森严，很多机构都尽量避免称呼领导的职位头衔。然而，一个职位头衔会方便机构的领导在外交际，因为外部人士会比较尊敬头衔较高的机构领导人。最妥善的解决领导们的头衔称谓问题的办法是在外部使用这些称谓而避免在组织内部使用这些称呼。
C：即使组织内部大家都知道管理者在外部使用职务称谓，但这并不影响内部上下级之间的交流。
是排除了文末的妥协方案可能带来的坏结果。从而支持结论
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |