ChaseDream

标题: prep p1-134 希望G 友帮助 [打印本页]

作者: 蓝飞    时间: 2009-4-26 15:23
标题: prep p1-134 希望G 友帮助

134.
            
(31696-!-item-!-188;#058&004702)

 

Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than nonunion members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend less time with each.

 

(A) imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend

(B) imposing stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients, and spending

(C) that impose stricter limits on medical services, require doctors to see more patients, and spend

(D) that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending

(E) that impose stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients and spending

答案,为什么? spend究竟是union members还是 plans发出的?


作者: AlienX    时间: 2009-4-26 15:31
是doctors
作者: 蓝飞    时间: 2009-4-26 15:54

如果是doctors的话,那spend不是应该和to see 平行么,那么D中的spending怎么能对呢?

不是很清楚,可不可以把句子结构和意思解释下,我现在有点晕......

谢谢呢~~~~~


作者: huangxiuying    时间: 2009-4-26 16:14

impose 和require平行,spending做伴随状语,要求医生多看些病人所以同时每个病人的时间就会减少

我觉得如果改成require doctors to see more patients and to spend从语法上没错,逻辑意思似乎没有原句好

继续讨论


作者: AlienX    时间: 2009-4-27 01:26
"spending less time with each"是see more patient的隨伴.
因為see的邏輯主語是doctors, 所以spending的邏輯主語也是doctors.




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3