ChaseDream

标题: 请问：补充3题 with跳跃修饰 [打印本页]

作者: JerryGuan 时间: 2004-2-23 11:51
标题: 请问：补充3题 with跳跃修饰

3．The department defines a private passenger vehicle as one registered to an individual with a gross weight of less than 8,000 pounds.

(A) as one registered to an individual with a gross weight of less than 8,000 pounds

(B) to be one that is registered to an individual with a gross weight of less than 8,000 pounds

(D) to have a gross weight less than 8,000 pounds and being registered to an individual（C）

(E) as having a gross weight of less than 8,000 pounds and registered to an individual

fficeffice" />

问：A为何错？是因为语法上，with 短语必须修饰其前面的“an individual”，而不是“one”吗？With 难道不可以跳跃修饰吗？那么再看OG104

104. The diet of the ordinary Greek in classical times was largely vegetarian--vegetables, fresh cheese, oatmeal, and meal cakes, and meat rarely.

(A) and meat rarely

(B) and meat was rare

(C) with meat as rare

(D) meat a rarity

(E) with meat as a rarity （独立主格？）

作者: Snazzy 时间: 2004-2-23 13:59
1， with跳跃修饰 ---〉I can not think of any example

2, 3 --->'with 8000 pounds' modifies 'individual'

3, OG 104, 独立主格, right. but it's not 跳跃修饰 -->

The diet was vegetarian, with meat ...

作者: JerryGuan 时间: 2004-2-23 17:16
明白了，with 短语，前面没有逗号时是直接修饰前面名词，若有逗号，则有可能是独立主格，不可能是跳跃修饰前面的名词。

也即with 要紧跟其修饰对象后！

谢谢S~~~

作者: 小彩 时间: 2004-2-23 23:11
根据lzm的解释

registered应该也用错了吧。

一般，过去分词修饰时表示有个过去的含义在里面。

似乎经验如此，但是不能确定，还望大虾指！

作者: JerryGuan 时间: 2004-2-24 13:00

楼上的小彩的结论我也不知~~高手指点。

另外，我还发现，with表示限定定语：

141. Unlike transplants between identical twins, whose genetic endowment is the same, all patients receiving hearts or other organs must take antirejection drugs for the rest of their lives.fficeffice" />

(A) Unlike transplants between identical twins, whose genetic endowment is the same

(B) Besides transplants involving identical twins with the same genetic endowment

(C) Unless the transplant involves identical twins who have the same genetic endowment

(D) Aside from a transplant between identical twins with the same genetic endowment

(E) Other than transplants between identical twins, whose genetic endowment is the same

In A and B, the phrases beginning Unlike... and Besides... modify patients, the subject of the main clause; thus A absurdly states that Unlike transplants ..., patients... must take ... drugs, and B that all patients except for transplants... must take ... drugs. In B and D the expression identical twins with the same genetic endowment wrongly suggests that only some identical twin pairs are genetically identical. In E, the construction Other than transplants..., all patients ... must take... drugs illogically suggests, as in B, that some patients are transplants. Choice C, the best answer, solves these problems by using a clause introduced by Unless to describe the exception to the rule and a nonrestrictive clause beginning with who to describe the characteristic attributed to all identical twins.

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)