ChaseDream

标题: 新prep1-187 [打印本页]

作者: zhuceg    时间: 2009-4-7 21:55
标题: 新prep1-187
187.    (27622-!-item-!-188;#058&002521)

United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts within the Democratic party during his first term, that included assistant majority whip and vice-chair of the Democratic Senatorial Committee.
A. that included
B. which includes
C. including
D. some of which were
E. among them being

C 选项为答案

问题是用“including”不会有修饰term或者party的歧义吗?

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-4-7 22:01:40编辑过]

作者: dalphia    时间: 2009-4-7 23:26
'includeing' 后的内容是不同的职位(posts),用which的话修饰的可能是term,可能是party, 逻辑有错误还有歧异,所以只能用including修饰中心词post

作者: zhuceg    时间: 2009-4-7 23:51
多谢dalphia, 如果用定语从句的话, 肯定是有修饰歧义的,排除法做完这道题后一直在考虑的就是是否有更明显强烈的理由用including。

作者: fhmmj    时间: 2009-5-4 21:52
including的逻辑主语不是应该是句子主语吗?

作者: dalphia    时间: 2009-8-7 22:04
quote:
     including的逻辑主语不是应该是句子主语吗?
****
后置的‘, including (或其他doing形式的分词)’可以作定语修饰前面句中的一个名词,也可以作状语修饰前面的句子表示与前句谓语动词(前句必须有谓语动词)的伴随、结果等关系

作后置状语时:
', which do/ that do'和‘, doing’只能选', doing' (注意是在定语从句和,doing比较时)

作后置定语时:
‘which do / that do’能够通过‘do’的单复数强制修饰正确的对象,但如果这个do没有单复数,比如may do, ', to which ...', etc, 此项只能修饰','之前最临近的<n>;

which项错了的话看', doing'项: doing一律修饰‘,’前最临近的<n>短语的中心词(比如这句话including跳过了with短语修饰posts)

作前置定语时:
一定是主句主语发出的动作,且doing这个动作发生再主句谓语动词之前或同时
eg. using a certain equipment, scientists
    detected ...:using由scientists发出,且发生在deteced之前

作者: 没办法1987    时间: 2009-8-24 16:57

lz,

首先,有个认知性的错误,

including是介词

langman上面:

including
        

used to introduce something or someone that is part of a larger group or amount you have just mentioned [≠ excluding]:

The price is £25.50, including postage and packing.

You'll need a variety of skills, including leadership and negotiating.






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3