[求助]GWD-TN-12-Q38 - ChaseDream

In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances, a petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?” The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.

Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?

Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.
In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public.
The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.
There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.
The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.

原来的ordince并不是全国范围。现在有petition说是全国范围禁烟。这让人们误以为，只是原来的ordince 所限制的范围扩大，而实际上petition 是想在全国范围内，对公众开放的零售企业和政府禁烟

由于郊区对公众开放的零售企业和政府很少，所以公众不会想到这个petiton 是这个目的。