ChaseDream

标题: 求助！求助！ [打印本页]

作者: zcy11234 时间: 2009-4-3 23:43
标题: 求助！求助！

103.
(30029-!-item-!-188;#058&004082)

Simply because they are genetically engineered does not make it any more likely for plants to become an invasive or persistent weed, according to a decade-long study published in the journal Nature.

(A) because they are genetically engineered does not make it any more likely for plants to

(B) because it is genetically engineered does not make a plant any more likely to

(D) being genetically engineered does not make a plant any more likely to

(E) being genetically engineered does not make a plant any more likely that it will become

问：being出现极少可能成为正确选项? being在这里充当的什么成分？看不懂啊

请哪位G友帮助我！谢谢

作者: njkf1987 时间: 2009-4-4 00:30
试一下，欢迎指正~
being选项必错的时候，being一般都可以省略的，比如being加名词或者形容词的情况。这里being是作为状语结构的一部分。其实因为短语优于从句，把A，B稍作修改就是现在这种形式了，其实是现在分词做状语，但是这个词还要用到被动。。。。所以就成这种形式了。。。如果我们练习改句子，可能也会改成这样。。。。而且我感觉Simply是修饰be genetically engineered的

作者: zcy11234 时间: 2009-4-4 14:53
谢谢你，但是这样解释的话，这句话就没主语了？

作者: stellachan 时间: 2009-4-4 15:00
Simply being genetically engineered does not make a plant any more likely to become an invasive or persistent weed, according to a decade-long study published in the journal Nature.

那个部分就是主语吧~

如果是AB选项有because 只有一个状语从句了

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-4-4 15:01:01编辑过]

作者: zcy11234 时间: 2009-4-4 16:59

stellachan

Simply being genetically engineered does not make a plant any more likely to become an invasive or persistent weed, according to a decade-long study published in the journal Nature.

那个部分就是主语吧~

如果是AB选项有because 只有一个

恍然大悟！！！谢谢两位

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)