192.
(27115-!-item-!-188;#058&002238) A E
In 1988, the Council on Economic Priorities began publishing Shopping for a Better World, with the simple thesis of consumers having the power to change companies by the simple expedient of refusing to buy.
A. with the simple thesis of consumers having
B. which had the simple thesis of consumers having
C. where the thesis was simple: consumers having
D. with a thesis that is a simple one: consumers have
E. whose thesis was simple: consumers have
正确答案是E，我选A
请问：1.A 有无明显错误？WITH的用法是否正确？
2.having 在何时取其为错误选项？
A的明显错误在于：
1. thesis of sb having sth 的结构，是100%被gmac否定的结构。 必须改成同位结构。gmac非常反感，写出 sth of sb doing sth 如果划线部分是要说明 sth的内容，这么使用没有任何生还余地。除非划线部分 绝对有必要被看成修饰sb的定语，那你可以这样用。例子太多了 news of sb doing/evidence of sth doing 也都错。
2. with用的不好，因为语法上 with是用来修饰 the Council 和 Shopping for a Better World都可以。
但是，我有一个问题一直困扰我，我感觉GMAT当中很多with 都是错误选项?
请问，是否with一个很重要的错误就是（前面你提到的）指代不清的问题？
谢谢！
要结合 具体问题来看。
, with sth blabla 放在句末是很常见的结构。这一结构使用的时候，一般是用来修饰 Subject。但是这里 逻辑上 明显是修饰Object，根据修饰原则就近修饰object也可以。
so，这样的使用不是太好，但语法上不是绝对的错。
A的明显错误在于：
1. thesis of sb having sth 的结构，是100%被gmac否定的结构。 必须改成同位结构。gmac非常反感，写出 sth of sb doing sth 如果划线部分是要说明 sth的内容，这么使用没有任何生还余地。除非划线部分 绝对有必要被看成修饰sb的定语，那你可以这样用。例子太多了 news of sb doing/evidence of sth doing 也都错。
2. with用的不好，因为语法上 with是用来修饰 the Council 和 Shopping for a Better World都可以。
75. (28533-!-item-!-188;#058&003994)
Some patients who do not respond to therapies for depression may simply have received inadequate treatment, having, for example, been prescribed a drug at a dosage too low to be effective or having been taken off a drug too soon.
(A) having, for example, been prescribed a drug at a dosage too low to be effective or having been
(B) having, for example, a drug prescription that was ineffective because the dosage was too low, or being
(C) as, for example, having too low of a dosage of a prescribed drug for it to be effective, or being
(D) when they have, for example, been prescribed too low a drug dosage for it to be effective, or were
(E) for example, when they have a drug prescription with a dosage too low to be effective, or been
楼上的意思我不太理解，what's your point??
现在有新 的prep 破解了吗，请问在那里可以下载，谢谢
嗯，再冲刺一回，可是有时候很烦，老有电话进来。
你也在北美吗
A的明显错误在于：
1. thesis of sb having sth 的结构，是100%被gmac否定的结构。 必须改成同位结构。gmac非常反感，写出 sth of sb doing sth 如果划线部分是要说明 sth的内容，这么使用没有任何生还余地。除非划线部分 绝对有必要被看成修饰sb的定语，那你可以这样用。例子太多了 news of sb doing/evidence of sth doing 也都错。
2. with用的不好，因为语法上 with是用来修饰 the Council 和 Shopping for a Better World都可以。
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |