A major health insurance company in Lagolia pays for special procedures prescribed by physicians only if the procedure is first approved as “medically necessary” by a company-appointed review panel. The rule is intended to save the company the money it might otherwise spend on medically unnecessary procedures. The company has recently announced that in order to reduce its costs, it will abandon this rule.
Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest justification for the company’s decision?
A. Patients often register dissatisfaction with physicians who prescribe nothing for their ailments.
B. Physicians often prescribe special procedures that are helpful but not altogether necessary for the health of the patient.
C. The review process is expensive and practically always results in approval of the prescribed procedure.
D. The company’s review process does not interfere with the prerogative of physicians, in cases where more than one effective procedure is available, to select the one they personally prefer.
E. The number of members of the company-appointed review panel who review a given procedure depends on the cost of the procedure.
我选的是E 答案是C.不知原因？
同问
up
My answer is B.
B,E都是无关选项，首先B的physician是不是prescribe这些helpful的special procedures是没有关系的，因为原文中说only if the procedure is first approved by a company-appointed panel,注意insurance company pay不pay是由这个panel决定的，而不是physician因此B无关。
E说的是组成panel的人数由这个procedure的成本决定，无关选项。
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |